Now that I'm a full-time gentleman loaffeur and vertical hedonist, the reading tends to run way ahead of the blogging. By the time I get around to writing about this or that matter, the spirit has moved on to the next shiny squirrel.
This subject of demons is a case in point. Two weeks ago I was babbling over with enthusiasm about naughty angels, while this week it's Maximus the Confessor and Mexican garage rock (https://open.spotify.com/album/2IgygCCKlFvGdG6FGQwDmg).
Who can keep up with such impulsive zigs of zagsy?
As you know, the blog is one man's struggle to somehow keep it together, but it's an ongrowing challenge, and where does Artie Shaw fit in? Oddly enough he does fit in, and not just because he lived a few exurban blocks away in Newbury Park. Rather, he was a true oddball, and not just because he divorced Ava Gardner. He also divorced Lana Turner (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artie_Shaw#Personal_life).
Now, what do demons do all day with their idle hands? According to Bonino, they basically oppose man and God, and in particular, the former's journey to the latter.
Or, we can begin the analysis at our end, and ask: just what is it that interferes with the vertical adventure? Clearly, something gets in the way, or this would be heaven. Why can't a man even pretend to get along with Ava Gardner?
There's a kind of jihad going on, and like the more familiar one, it's an unholy war, or a war on holiness. Again, this is just an empirical fact, the question being, who or what's behind it? Is it organized? And who's in charge?
It reminds me of when you see the seeming coordination of the propagaslight media mob. Last week they were all using the phrase viral blizzard. Who put this cliché in their ears, and why did they all repeat it?
I mean, at least come up with your own way of expressing it, like viralanch or scarenado. It's the same with insurrection. What happened to mostly peaceful protest?
Anyway, the hostile forces. I first began taking these forces seriously in 1995 or so, because that's when I began opposing them. Little did I know that embarking on the Spiritual Path is a formal declaration of war against them -- whoever or whatever they are.
Back then I would have regarded Christian ideas about Satan as naive and superstitious. But Vedantic ideas about demonic hostile forces? Sophisticated.
Here's a passage from an old favorite, The Adventure of Consciousness, nor do I necessarily disagree with the description: The adverse forces
are highly conscious forces whose sole aim, apparently, is to discourage the seeker and divert him from the path he has chosen.... With remarkable skill, they take apart the whole system of our quest to prove that we are deluding ourselves and that our efforts will come to nothing....
These nonlocal pests
have a thousand and one ways of attacking us -- for it is indeed an attack -- and the more determined we are, the more relentless they become....
But if you stay in the matrix, they mostly leave you alone:
As long as we march with the common herd, life is relatively easy.... however, as soon as we want to get out of the rut, a thousand forces rise up, suddenly very interested that we behave "like everybody else"; we discover how well organized the imprisonment is.
Interesting, the very same reality was described in my thoroughly secular training in psychoanalysis, but in that religion it's called resistance. That is, the moment the patient tries to improve, resistance gets in the way.
But who or what are the resistors? Here's one definition, from A Dictionary of Kleinian Thought:
Resistance is an attack upon the capacity of the mind to think and know (the epistemophilic instinct) which Bion referred to as "attacks on linking."
Attacks on linking? Is this what demons do?
Of course. It's even in the name, for diabolos is the scatterer, is he not?
Back to Bonino: while the intention is to sow division -- both extra- and intrapsychic -- the demonic world "is not sheer chaos. It exhibits a certain form of unity and social cohesion." For
Just as evil is a parasite of the good, anarchy is a parasite of order. If anarchy were to triumph, it would immediately self-destruct. Among the demons, therefore, a certain order remains that continues, at the very heart of their chaos, to give testimony to the divine wisdom and goodness.
So, demons are a left-handed compliment to God; we don't say complement, because that implies a Manichaean dualism.
Now, here is something I did not know, but the moment you hear it, you say of course: despite their "order," it turns out that "the demons detest one another" as much as, say, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. They agree on the ends -- destruction and regression -- but theirs is "a confederation welded together by a common hatred of God and men."
Same with the demons.
10 comments:
are highly conscious forces whose sole aim, apparently, is to discourage the seeker and divert him from the path he has chosen.... With remarkable skill, they take apart the whole system of our quest to prove that we are deluding ourselves and that our efforts will come to nothing....
Oh. Those jerks.
By the time I get around to writing about this or that matter, the spirit has moved on to the next shiny squirrel.
I've had a practice, the past few years, of doing a daily novena around 11 am. On the one hand, the overarching focus is usually the same general sorts of things; on the other, as various knots are untied, the details change quite a bit, even from one week to the next. I tend not to notice unless I really think about it, but the shiny squirrel effect is very real.
Do the demons have a guild, I do not know, but they definitely have their prince. As to their organizational skills, well, it seems to me that we can at least have an inkling of this, empirically, when we look at the size of the bureaucracy under we which mere mortals labor, and how they all try and step on each other's toes. The other day you mentioned in comments to an earlier post Pride and Envy. These two run rampant in demons, I would think. As to their attacks intensifying when resistance is raised by individuals struggling vertically, the angel Michael can give us a hint. "The Lord rebuke you." Have faith in the strength of this four word prayer.
Right on cue.
Gotta say, it's been rather pleasant around here the past couple of weeks...
We'll stipulate that someone needs his daily demon.
The demons do not compel, they nudge. What happens next is anyone's guess.
I'm reminded of Princess Unikitty describing Cloud Cuckoo Land.
Re. Z-Man's piece, this:
The hive mind, the emergent behavior is like the fluid inside one of those tankers. When the ruling class jams on the brakes or takes a sudden turn, general opinion can swing wildling in one direction.
Puts me in mind of Plutarch's description of Caesar's scheming:
"At that time, Julius Caesar returning home from his praetorship out of Spain, began to lay such a plot that presently brought him into great favour, and afterwards much increased his power, but otherwise utterly undid Pompey and the commonwealth.
Now he was to sue for his first consulship, and considering the enmity betwixt Pompey and Crassus: if he joined with the one, he made the other his enemy: so he devised to make them friends, a thing seeming of great honesty at the first sight, but yet a pestilent device, and as subtle a practice as could be. For he well knew that opposite parties or factions in a commonwealth, like passengers in a boat, serve to trim and balance the unsteady motions of power there; whereas if they combine and come all over to one side, they cause a shock which will be sure to overset the vessel and carry down everything."
Put into today's terms, so long as America truly had a two-party system, there was a degree of stability that kept the whole thing from capsizing. But what happens when it's a uni-party system, where one makes all the rules and the other puts on a show of opposition while in actuality giving in to everything the first party demands?
Wild swinging and loss of control.
The illusion of control -- which is a side effect of the illusion of knowledge -- seems to be innate, and might even be an aspect of the Fall. Hayek is The Man when it comes to the impossibility of the kind of knowledge claimed by politicians.
Along those lines, China's one-child policy had unexpected consequences.
Speaking of people with delusions of control, we just saw the new Spiderman movie.
On the plus side, as many people have said, it's not woke. My kids enjoyed it.
Notably, my 9-year-old daughter, who usually hates action movies, really liked this one.
That's because it's My Little Pony in a Spiderman skin suit.
Post a Comment