Wednesday, June 17, 2020

The Great Awokening, or Satan's Own Spiritual Revival

Let's try to knock another one off the desk, this time The Politics of Truth, a collection of essays that could scarcely be more timely, being that we are currently undergoing a plunge into the Politics of the Lie, the likes of which I've certainly never experienced in my life.

Indeed, I suspect it's no coincidence that Voegelin decided to pay us a visit precisely now, since 1) no other thinker better illuminates the kind of political pathology currently afflicting us, and 2) no other time in our recent history better exemplifies Voegelin's ideas. Compared to what is going on now, Obama was but a sulking, lazy, and ill-educated adolescent, whereas now we're dealing with a sociopathic cohort of spiritually deformed pseudo-adults.

Is there a name for this politico-spiritual disease? No, there are several: "deformation of reality," "gnostic derailment," "dogmatomachy," "ideological pseudo-reality," "secular moonshine," "para-Marxist buffoonery," etc.

As we know -- good and hard, right to the sweetbreads -- we are in the midst of A Great Awokening, which is a perverted -- and inverted -- caricature of the Great Awakenings that have periodically occurred in America. The first one occurred between 1730 and 1740, and this spiritual revolution set the stage for the physical one that would come to fruition a generation or two later. As John Adams famously wrote,

The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people.... This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution.

The Second Great Awakening took place between 1790 and 1840. And according to Prof. Wiki there was a third between 1855 and 1930, and even a fourth between 1960 and 1980.

By my calculation, that adds up to 145 years of Awakening out of the 234 years since the Declaration, which is over 60%. And what do we call the periods in between? The Great Slumbers? The Pneumatic Snoozes? And what on earth is happening now? In my opinion, the Great Awokening isn't simply a harmless nap but a perverse caricature of these past Awakenings.

Sandoz points out that in past awakenings, "the church served as a school for politics." But in the case of the Awokening it is the other way around: politics is the school of a new religion. Interestingly, no one who is a member of this new religion realizes he is one. Rather, only non-members even recognize that it is a religion.

That's odd. Then again, perhaps not. We must remember that "religion" is a modern concept. For the great majority of history, people didn't know they "had" a religion. Rather, they were simply immersed in a cosmos -- an order -- that included an uncritical religiosity. Conscious religiosity as a separate modality only emerges with the recognition of other religions.

Extremes meet, such that our postmodern Awokening is rooted in a premodern mentality of uncritical religiosity. Here again, this is soph-evident to non-members but veiled to the Woke.

Real religion involves a human ascent and divine pull into the objective order of the cosmos. What then occurs in the logocidal anti-religion of the Woke? Is there an analogous downward pull, AKA temptation at one end, the old "glamor of evil" at the other? Preliminary indications say Yes, but let's continue to flip.

Now, what can the sudden acquisition of Wokeness! be but a caricature of spiritual conversion? Sandoz describes the latter as

a personal experience of regeneration.... The individual is flooded with a sense of divine presence and intense participation or union with God...

Let's stipulate that the Woke protesters, looters, and crybullies are indeed flooded with something, and that they are most definitely participating in some sort of mock mystical body. Yes, it's a "mob," but what is the interior of a mob? What is the psychic glue that holds it together?

It is at once a Krazy Glue and a Gorilla Glue, since it encourages decompensation, regression, and impulsivity unmediated by discursive thought. Come to think of it, it is also a Super Glue, in that it evokes the Neitzschean superman, or the failure to attain mature manhood masquerading as its transcendence -- the quintessence of which being the Antifa terrorist terrorized by the mother with whom he lives.

Among the chief hindrances to [the] life of true liberty is the oppression of men, who in service to evil deceive with untruth and impose falsehood in its place proclaiming it to be true....

Liberty is most truly exercised by living in accord with truth and is, therefore, the correlate of responsibility (Sandoz).

I suppose this is the first time a Great Awokening has fully unleashed itself on our shores, but certainly not the first in history. It occurred, for example, in the USSR. As Solzhenitsyn described it, "The destruction of souls for three-quarters of a century is the most frightening thing." We're not nearly that far into our own Awokening, but as the Aphorist reminds us,

Everything in history begins before where we think it begins and ends after where we think it ends.

So the Awokening has been with us for awhile, just not this overtly violent, powerful, and oppressive.

a major difficulty lies in the ostensible "neutrality" in the public schools, which in fact often serves to shelter expanding beachheads of safe havens for antireligious ideology and attacks on American society's moral convictions, radical doctrines ranging from political correctness to advocacy of homosexuality, and neo-Marxism parading as dispassionate science....

The Woke have already lost the argument, but they don't know it. Or they do know it, hence the attacks on free speech and the violence to persons and property. Progressives may not know much, but they know violence and intimidation work.

The ideological antipolitics of the nihilistic second realities has been defeated theoretically, politically, economically, and by all the facts of human existence.

Yet unremitting assault continues on the American and generally Western heritage in the name of enlightenment and social progress by the ghosts of the very politics of atrocity whose true monuments are Nazi death camps and the Soviet gulag. Its protagonists, unable to cope with reason and experience, resort to brute force tending toward the lethal.

That was published in 1996. It's no longer "tending." Rather, that toward which it was tending stands revealed.

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well here I am in pole position. Where I don't want to be. However, it is either comment now or risk not being able to come back. So here goes....

The post is historically fascinating in terms of the discussions of the periodic "awakenings." I don't think anyone has before undertaken to connect the Woke movement with these periods of fervor; good original thinking there.

You describe a conversion experience as "a personal experience of regeneration.... The individual is flooded with a sense of divine presence and intense participation or union with God..."

Has anyone had a conversion experience in their lifetime? I see Puritan literature rife with conversion narratives; now where the devil have these stories gone?

Pipe up if you can tell of this. I have had many divine presence, participation and union experiences, but these tend to dribble in, and cannot be described as "a flood." I continue to have mild, transient experiences of this nature on a daily basis. Am I converted or am I not? I would say, cumulatively, I must be converted many times over as the weight of these experiences accrues, causing certainty to set in.

Doubt tries to wedge itself in and also continues to compete but the conversion experiences tend to outweigh it by a wide margin.

I can be described as a left-wing tree-hugger, a real Woke dame. Democrat, hemp, vegan. The whole nine yards. Patchouli oil in the hair. Unshaven legs. I have a wife. That should tell you all you need to know.

The way you describe Woke folk, they cannot be converted to God, however my example is an exception which would stand in need of explaining.

-Candace Tripolitano

Anonymous said...

I have had a conversion experience. And God is involved.

I’ve worked in utopian offices, where everybody was civil and cool and just like family and the work got done and we all had a reasonably good time doing it, relatively speaking.

I’ve also worked in dystopian offices, where everybody was paranoid and gossipy backbitey and the workloads were unfairly distributed and almost everybody was miserable, relatively speaking.

So I commenced upon a study to determine why utopian workplaces were so different from the dystopian.

It turned out that I was the problem. Whenever I was going through a happy patch everybody around me was super positive and prosperous and that corporation had record profit years. And whenever I was going through a sad patch everybody around me was nihilistic and satanic and leftist poverty and that company was on the verge of going bankrupt.

Not to get all hubristically tooting my own horn and all, but I came to the conclusion that I am God. You people need to know how lucky you are.

Anonymous said...

Candace Tripolitano,

If you are a leftist then you are going straight to hell. No third ways about it. You really need to be taking me seriously, since this is God talking.

Consider this your last warning.

julie said...

Real religion involves a human ascent and divine pull into the objective order of the cosmos. What then occurs in the logocidal anti-religion of the Woke? Is there an analogous downward pull, AKA temptation at one end, the old "glamor of evil" at the other? Preliminary indications say Yes, but let's continue to flip.

We are slowly working our way through Pilgrim's Progress (week 34, for any who care to scroll down). This week's reading continues a discussion between characters Christian and Faithful, and one called Talkative who knows how to say all the right things. Today he'd be named "Virtue Signaller."

"His house is as empty of religion as the white of an egg is of savour. There is there neither prayer nor sign of repentance for sin; yea, the brute in his kind serves God far better than he. He is the very stain, reproach, and shame of religion, to all that know him; it can hardly have a good word in all that end of the town where he dwells, through him. Thus say the common people that know him, A saint abroad, and a devil at home. His poor family finds it so; he is such a churl, such a railer at and so unreasonable with his servants, that they neither know how to do for or speak to him. Men that have any dealings with him say it is better to deal with a Turk than with him; for fairer dealing they shall have at their hands. This Talkative (if it be possible) will go beyond them, defraud, beguile, and overreach them. Besides, he brings up his sons to follow his steps; and if he findeth in any of them a foolish timorousness, (for so he calls the first appearance of a tender conscience,) he calls them fools and blockheads, and by no means will employ them in much, or speak to their commendations before others. For my part, I am of opinion, that he has, by his wicked life, caused many to stumble and fall; and will be, if God prevent not, the ruin of many more."

Anonymous said...

@julie: It's funny how these types seem to always have been with us. Not for nothing did Jesus save his strongest condemnations for the Pharisees -- the "virtue signalers" of their time.

(Conversely, the only person that the Man from Galilee singled out for unconditional praise was a soldier of an occupying army, per Matthew 8:5–13. Something to think about the next time armed security forces are in our streets.)

neal said...

The god of this world is woke. Hell of a thing.
Most that read books should start hiding them just to maybe save a page or so.
The fortunate and comfortable will take the mark and make excuses.
The rest will wait their turn.
And that is why the icons weep mostly in the closet.

julie said...

Everything in history begins before where we think it begins and ends after where we think it ends.

Here is a lovely visual illustration. Note carefully the motion of the tiny bubbles around the larger rings; they reveal a hint of the real size, speed and power of the rotation, far greater than what can be seen.

Anonymous said...

The last real seizure of power by Marxist-inspired murderers - wasn’t that the 1975 Cambodian Genocide? Pol Pot and his guerrilla gang were directly inspired by French Marxist philosophies, and they mixed it in with native Cambodian mysticism, a lethal witch’s brew. That’s the origin of the infamous “Killing Fields”.

Here’s a ray of hope as far as we Americans are concerned, I think - as a country we have distinctly different, even mutant DNA, from the areas of the world that have in the past succumbed to mass Marxist barbarism. Europe and Russia had and have a legacy of monarchical rulership, often brutal ones. Asia, well, have to say it - it tends toward being collectivist-minded, and it’s had its share of barbarian rulers. These are places where, even if democracy takes a slight hold, the default trend is toward the past, toward authoritarianism.

Obviously the origin of the USA was rooted in anti-authoritarian, which makes it unique. Yes, of course this is an ideal not always lived up to, but you can’t erase its imprimatur on the American soul .....or on the land itself, and this is where it gets a little strange. Something I read once that stayed with me .....

The spirit of American independence has always fit in nicely, perhaps has even been tempered by, Native American mythos. As Native Americans understand it, that mythos was not “invented” by them, it came from the spirit of the land itself. Even as the settlers herded the NAs into reservations, even as we live in modernity that shuts us off from the land, we still imbibe the spirit - in many ways we are in accordance with the mythos because it’s impossible not to be.

The essence of that mythos is freedom, freedom of spirit. The famous Native American “Ghost Dance” eg., is a celebration of spirit in which they dance collectively, but each individual dances his or her own personal sacred dance in order to unite their own individualities with Spirit.

If the land itself we live on speaks that kind of language of spiritual freedom, we can’t help but be affected by it. That’s why I think we can’t completely succumb to the ugly collectivist madness that’s risen to unprecedented levels at this time. And again, I have reason believe that this current insanity is not some victorious resurgence, but is the scream of a utopian social Mvt circling the drain for the last time. There’s a whole lot of Americans out there who are silent, patient, watching, in what you could call an almost Native American-style of silence and patience, until it’s time to be silent no more.

will

julie said...

Will, well said. I had never heard about that particular Native American mythos, but there are greater things in Heaven and Earth, etc. Perhaps that explains why North America never had (so far as we know) the type of empire - not that there weren't empires, of course - that flourished in Central and South America.

Anyway, you're right. Americans are different, even with all the immigrants who have been flooded across our borders in recent decades. Our response to the current crises has not been so much one of cowering, as one of preparing, as anyone checking the record high gun sales could tell you. We are mostly a civil people, prone to avoiding conflict (which is how things have gotten to this point); even so, we are not going to go quietly into the boxcars.

And of course, beyond everything, I do very much believe that God has His hand in all of this.

Anonymous said...

will, I like your comment regarding Native American silence and patience.

When one reads the sayings of Seattle, Sequoya, Goyatle, Tenaya, and other Native American chiefs, one feels a sense of simplicity, cleanliness, and purity. Their sayings seem wholesome and true. They seem to cut through the bullsh*t. The Great Spirit indeed. Why not?

They did not have Jesus, but they did think they were going to a better life when they departed. Who is to say they did not make it?

Let us smoke and contemplate.

Anonymous said...

Julie, I think worth remembering that the far-left, which has subsumed the Dems party leadership, represents only a very small minority of the American population. Even the Flyover State Dems couldn’t vote for the far left candidates in the Dem primaries, which is why they ended up voting for Biden, as ridiculous as he is - he’s the closest thing to a “moderate” Dem candidate as they have.

Small bands of thugs willing to use terrorist methods of persuasion have succeeded elsewhere in cowing the larger population, but yeah, we’re different.

Agreed, God has the ultimate hand, as long as we as individuals stay in tune with Him.

w.

julie said...

Small bands of thugs - yes, watching some of the footage of the riots in various places, it was apparent that a lot of the visual framing was done in such a way as to make the crowds of actual looters and rioters seem much bigger than they really are. The whole point is to make those who disagree feel overpowered, outnumbered and powerless, even though nothing could be farther from the truth. And slowly, more people are catching on to the con. Last I heard there were over a million ticket requests for the rally this weekend, for a venue that seats less than a hundred thousand. Boat rallies over the weekend were pretty impressive, too, though I don't recall seeing them mentioned on any news channel (I don't watch, but a family member does). If more people saw things like that, it might strengthen their hearts, so of course it must be hidden.

Anonymous said...

Well, the Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safe Communities wouldn’t have happened if it wasn’t for the protests.

Or... was it the boat parade that changed executive minds? Discuss.

Personally, I don’t want police power to be too cold, or too hot, but to be just right. And competent. America is supposed to be about competence, and not just corruption.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous -

Native Americans were hardly perfect. They practiced inter-tribal slavery, really horrible forms of torture (including the Iroquois), and by politically correct standards, were extremely sexist. But their virtues were undeniable, which is why whites use all manner of NA symbolism to name their sports teams - you don't do that with a people you don’t respect.

w.
.

Anonymous said...

Morally, ethically, spiritually... native American tribes were all over the place.

In an alternate reality, wouldn’t you have rather had the Hopi armed with nukes than the Aztecs? And why did San Diego State name their teams the Aztecs, instead of a far more respectable name like the Hopis?

Ever notice that while some Indian tribes were crazy violent and others spiritual-peaceful, the violent ones are always the ones to get their teams named after them?

And speaking of Christians, is there even a single team named after anything salt-of-the-earth Christian? Why are the Fighting Irish cooler than say, The Alter Boys? Horned Frogs are better than Holy Grails?

I think there’s a bit more to discuss here.

Anonymous said...

While you ponder why some native American tribes were far more into sinning than other tribes were...

The Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben and Mrs. Butterworths brands shall be no more, because of their political incorrectness.

But in other news, the New York Mets (Metrosexuals) are being renamed the “New York Niggers” in an attempt to toughen up the teams image.

Anonymous said...

So SCOTUS nixed Trumps ending of DACA.

So much for cheering conservative judges. While liberal judges can be accused of being too bleeding heart, one forgets that conservative judges might not care one whit about emotional cultural issues when there are rich and powerful pushing for what they want, like the labor cost savings from undocumented workers, regardless of any damage that's done to the existing and legitimate citizen culture, workers, or tax base.

Anonymous said...

The Crusaders was not uncommon name for high school sports teams. Totally un PC now.

Comanches was also fairly common tag. The real Comanches were fierce, was the just about the last tribe to go down. Previously, they had almost exterminated the Apaches in tribal warfare.

w.

julie said...

The High School I went to was Thomas Jefferson, the mascot was Raiders. If it hasn't been changed yet, I am sure it will soon be renamed for some mostly-peaceful protester like Che Guevara, and the team mascot made more friendly. Maybe the Non-Binary Bunnies. Wouldn't want to seem intimidating to rival schools, after all.

Even worse, all the Jr. High schools all had Native American themes. Still do, apparently, but for how much longer?

Anonymous said...

The great icon of the American Cowboy, in some sense, our first Action Hero - speaks only when necessary, man of few words, slow to anger, but when provoked by injustice, takes action. These attributes passed on to other film and novel American icons, the private PI, the lone lawman in city streets, Robert Mitchum, Steve McQueen, etc. ...

Where did these personal attributes come from? Possibly from Native Americans from whom the original cowboys imitated to a degree.

w.

Anonymous said...

Julie, the high school I went to .... the Indians. I’m not sure if that’s still a thing. And this was in a mostly all-white, now very leftist suburb.

w,

Anonymous said...

The spirituality of NA’s was, I gather, land/earth-based. I would suppose many Christians would have trouble with this, which is understandable. However, the modern Druid revival, which is also earth spirit based, does have quite a few Christians in their membership, and not just flaky ones.

w.

Anonymous said...

It is good for us to leave behind all names and depictions of oppressors.

By erasing oppressors from the annals of history, we heal ourselves collectively.

Therefore let us not stand on the way of this healing. Discard all memorabilia of questionable morality.

Bury your surplus guns deep so no one may find them before they have rusted and returned to the Earth from whence they came.

Be like a tree in the forest, taking in only pure air, water, and sunlight, and exuding life-giving oxygen and a fresh scent

Let nature be your teacher; She shall set you aright.

Anonymous said...

Since the prevailing notion of who the “oppressor” tends to change over time, maybe best to not have any depictions at all. Let’s do away with history all together while we’re at it.

How many “collective healings” do we have to go thru until we actually get healed? I’m starting to question this collective healing thing ....

I don’t have any surplus guns to bury. I have all the guns I need, no more.

w.

Dougman said...

"The last years of his life, until his death in 1939, Eastman devoted principally to lecturing. In the last analysis, Charles Eastman's most important contribution to American letters is as a writer of autobiography and as a preserver of Sioux Indian legends, myths, and history."

https://biography.yourdictionary.com/charles-a-eastman

Fascinating figure in the Midwestern history.

Anonymous said...

The problem with nature are the predators. And the diseases. And the poisons and hurricanes and gamma ray bursts. So man tries to control nature for the betterment of mankind (plants and animals are on their own).

But then some men, greedy and foul, take control of the controlling and things go kerfluey.

It seems the hard part is knowing who's greedy and foul. "Everybody is!" some cry. "Sooner or later everybody is greedy and foul!"

But everybody has worked, lived, and visited situations that were healthy, happy and prosperous, while also having memories of also having worked, lived, and visited situations that were downright foul. "Man were those different things!" the people say.

So everybody asks: "Why were they so different?"

And then the people set about trying to recreate those conditions. Some become policemen so they can legally beat the crap out of black men. Others dress as school marms with flowered hats, but they're neither teachers nor female. Still others feverishly design AI robots, hoping that we'll make great pets.

Do the Sioux have better answers? Maybe, I dunno. But I do know that acting all Aztec, to always have to conquer for bodies for your insatiable sacrifice god, leads to a merry band of conquistadors arriving to unite all the tormented tribes into burning your capital to the ground. And then they leave with all your gold and women and leave behind a buncha diseases which kills what's left.

It's always something. But there seems to be reasons for this something.

Theme Song

Theme Song