I was searching the blog for a completely unrelated subject, when up popped this insultaining sociopolitical rant from December 2005, only a couple of months after I started the blog. It might have been one of the first of many posts Vanderleun linked to, which once provided me with something called "readers." In revisiting the post, not only did I find it mildly amusing, I've edited out the parts I didn't:
Some political behavior is just so primitive that human psychology falls short of explaining it. Instead, a keen-eyed psychologist must rely on other sciences like, for example, entomology.
Ever notice how ants, in their busy peregrinations, are constantly rushing up to each other and bumping heads? Turns out that it's not just to exchange pleasantries but to feed one another. If one ant is sated and the other one hungry, the former will produce a drop from its mouth that the other one gratefully gobbles down.
Apparently, ants have what is known as a "social stomach" in addition to a personal stomach. Until food passes into the personal stomach and becomes the private property of said ant, any ant can stake a claim to the morsel. Entomologists have even conducted experiments on this, for example, feeding a few ants honey that has been colored with a blue-tinted dye. Soon enough, all of the ants in the community will show a blue tint in their abdomen.
This is pretty much how the left/liberal world works. It is filled with media ants, Hollywood ants, academic ants, singing ants, judicial ants, tenured ants, and lastly, political ants who all run around randomly bumping their heads together, so they're constantly regurgitating little half-digested bits of information and feeding them to one another. Pretty soon, just like the ants, they're all the same color.
Take, for example, the current hysteria about President Bush and the "domestic spying" [so hysterical that no one remembers it today].
If we could have somehow placed a dye in the New York Times, we would have seen how the meme left their proboscis and was sucked up by the MSM. From there, the MSM fed it to the politicians and bumped heads with their legion of inane analysts and dopey TV lawyers such as Jeffrey Toobin. It then trickled further down into the darker precincts of academia, the left-wing blogosphere, and Air America, and pretty soon every liberal's stomach was the same color as the New York Times was last Friday morning.
I thought about this as I was reading an essay by Thomas Lifson called The Liberal Bubble. He points out how our liberal elites have managed to construct such "a comfortable, supportive, and self esteem-enhancing environment. The most prestigious and widest-reaching media outlets reinforce their views, rock stars and film makers provide lyrics and stories making their points, college professors tell them they are right, and the biggest foundations like Ford fund studies to prove them correct."
If you're an empty-headed liberal, you never have to go far to get yourself a fill-up. Just turn on the TV. Pick up the newspaper. Listen to Bono. Read Time or Newsweek. Go to college. Attend a Christmas party. Liberalism is always in the air, like political muzak. Unlike conservatives, liberals find themselves in a congenial world that constantly mirrors their half-baked philosophy, so that it need never be thought through and actually digested in the personal stomach-mind.
American liberals are able to live their lives untroubled by what they regard as serious contrary opinion. The capture of the media, academic, and institutional high ground enables them to dismiss their conservative opponents as ill-informed, crude, bigoted, and evil. The memes are by now familiar. Rush Limbaugh and the other radio talkers "preach hate." Evangelicals are "religious fanatics" comparable to the Islamo-fascists in their desire to impose "theocracy".... Jewish conservatives are members of the "neocon" cult (Lifson).
[I've highlighted some passages from the following couple of paragraphs that provide some insight into what would become the MAGA movement a decade later.]
Liberalism has been reduced to an "in-group code, perfectly understandable and comforting among the elect, but increasingly disconnected from everyone else, and off-putting to those not included in the ranks of the in-group. Rather than focusing on facts, logic, and persuasion, liberals find it easier to employ labeling ('That’s racist!') and airy dismissal of contrary views to sway their audience, and because their authority figures in the media and academia accept this behavior, they assume it is persuasive to the rest of us."
Within the liberal in-group, such expressions of group norms "earn prestige," but "to the rest of society it becomes stranger and stranger, until it becomes repellant" (Lifson). Liberals "experience their differences with the rest of society as a sign of their advanced intelligence and consciousness. At best, they are perplexed at how long it is taking everyone else to catch-up with their enlightened state of understanding."
Liberals inhabit a world of such constant intellectual mirroring and self-reinforcement that it is possible for them to live a life relatively free of cognitive friction. Or at least it used to be. You can see how irritating it is for them to have to actually contend with competing world views, even something as innocuous as FNC (which is clearly more populist than conservative).
Unlike liberals, conservatives, in order to get through life, must have "dual citizenship." They must learn to negotiate a world dominated by liberals and by liberalism. Here in California I would never dream of publicly uttering the kinds of things liberals feel free to say in public.
Since conservatives have been outsiders for so long, they not only know how to "pass" in polite society, but they also know how to argue. In fact, most conservatives (including myself) started out liberal, so we know exactly how liberals think. The reverse is almost never true; conservatives don't become liberal unless they have sustained a closed head injury or are unfortunate victims of some other organic process.
On the one hand it would be much easier to live in an intellectually narcissistic world that mirrored my own thoughts. But once that happens, you may realize that they're not even really your thoughts. They're just half-digested blue memes, passed from one mind to another, in a caricature of thought. Another predictable day in the liberal anthill.
*****
Looking back from the perspective of 2025, it appears to me that the phenomenon described above is precisely the cause of the Democrat's current crisis. So comfortably detached did they become from reality due to incessant feeding of mis- and disinformation to one another, that they no longer have any idea how to communicate to half the population (i.e., men) and can't even offer a dictionary definition of the other half. They've lost the middle class, and are bleeding out Hispanic support.
And yet, blue-bellied stalwarts like the Times, CNN, MSNBC, and far left politicians continue to bump heads and exchange the same nonsense with one another. Maybe it's analogous to bears that get hooked on garbage. Once you come to rely upon the cognitive social stomach, you lose the ability to engage reality and feed yourself. It's why they can't help themselves from championing the 20-side of every 80/20 issue.
In order for them to reverse the trend, they will have to develop the kind of dual citizenship mentioned above, such that they actually familiarize themselves with both reality and with conservative arguments rather than just dismissing the latter as fascist/racist/sexist/transphobic, et al. For as they say, to know only one side of an argument is to know neither side.
True, the post is simplistic and polemical. And yet, if Democrats could have somehow exited their bubble and stopped living off of each other's BS, they wouldn't be in their current fix.
We didn't have AI in 2005. I'm guessing that Gemini will not be amused.
This text presents a highly critical and one-sided analysis of what the author terms the "left/liberal world." It uses an extended analogy of ants and their "social stomach" to illustrate how the author believes liberals consume and disseminate information.
No comments:
Post a Comment