Monday, April 22, 2013

Until the Last Liberal Professor is Strangled with the Entrails of the Last MSM Journalist

Letter XII, The Hanged Man, is another key archetype for us, as it speaks to the nonlocal happitat in which the Raccoon prefers to dwell -- or ne'er d'well, anyway -- which is upended roughly halfway between -- how to put it without being precipitously understood? -- between 〇 and ( ), or between the celestial and terrestrial planes.

(Recall from the book that ( ) stands for the world, which, in the absence of 〇, is impossibly broken, incomplete, empty, discontinuous and finally absurd; one might say that it is merely the exteriorization of Ø, of non-being.)

Tomberg says that this card "plunges us into the heart of the problem of the relationship between man and gravitation, and the conflicts that this relationship entails."

Something analogous to gravity operates at all levels of the cosmos and in all degrees of being, both interior and exterior, from the solar system, to culture, to politics, to personal relationships, to the self, and even to mind parasites.

In each case there is an attractive force that simultaneously draws subjects and objects toward other subjects or objects and toward their own "center of gravity"; we might say that one is an exteriorizing force, the other interiorizing (or centripetal and centrifugal).

We are not so much interested in the attraction of objects -- which is in the realm of physics -- as of subjects, for this is where the real mystery lies.

For example, once one becomes aware of the true self, it will begin to attract the kinds of relationships and experiences it requires to in order to grow. If one fails to live out of this interior center, then no matter what happens in life, it will be an incoherent stream of experiences with no possibility of synthesis into a higher unity. One can always paper over discontinuities, inconsistencies, holes, psychic envelopes, dead spots, unborns, etc., but there is a technical term for this: papering over, I guess.

Here again, this is why liberty is so critical to the articulation and development of the self. The self is something that pre-exists in the form of potential, but can only develop and be known through experience.

You might say that this implicate self must be exteriorized so as to be interiorized. It must be free to choose the objects, relationships, and experiences it requires in order to "be." This is why one man's paradise is another man's exile or prison -- even a living death. This is also why there can be no real spirituality in the absence of freedom, and in turn why leftism is intrinsically retrograde.

And when we say "real," we mean something like participation in being; in the spiritual realm it is not a matter of "to be or not to be." Rather, there is a continuum between the two. Vertically speaking, one might say we live in the phase space between these two great attractors, which I symbolize in the book as 〇 and Ø. As such, there are two final causes that operate in us; you could even call them eros and thanatos, or love and death. Probably Adam and Eve made a lousy choice, and here we are.

(A point of order: the 〇 <---> ( ) dialectic has to do with God and world, the latter of which is still "real," whereas the 〇 <---> Ø has slightly different implications, since the latter is "nothing," or absence of being; ( ) is at least "concrete," whereas Ø is merely vacuous -- like the difference between, say, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama, respectively.)

One way to look at it is to consider the fact that man only discovers himself -- i.e., acquires self-consciousness -- as a consequence of his partial alienation, his separateness from the rest of creation. Without some sort of division, there can be no higher unity.

Vaclav Havel writes that Man is the being who "has fallen out of Being and therefore continually reaches toward it, as the only entity by which and to which Being has revealed itself as a question [?!], as a secret and as meaning."

Again, we are suspended between the terms, or limits, of Being, and can seek to heal this separation in two different (vertical) directions. Havel: Man's "drama unfolds in the rupture between his orientation 'upward' and 'backward' and a constant falling 'downward' into now.'"

Either way, the human subject "is continually stepping outside itself in order to return to itself once more and, through this 'circulation,' it inevitably matures -- becomes itself." It is a "permanent balancing act" between the recovery of Being vs. being dragged "down into the world of things, surfaces, frantic consumption and self-absorption" (ibid.): man becomes a prisoner of his own mental productions instead of a gentleman slacker floating on the sea of Being.

As the death-stream draws us down to the terminal moraine of our lower nature, the life-stream pulls us in, up, and out, toward our nonlocal source above. Even the most cynical atheist cannot live -- not for a moment -- without this life-stream, for it is what pulls him toward truth, or love, or meaning -- even toward his hatred of God (since the latter is usually rooted in allegiance to an invented truth instead of attraction to Truth as such).

Tomberg agrees that "the domain of our freedom... shows the real and active presence of gravitation of a spiritual order." This is why people are attracted to God and religion to begin with, "for what is the phenomenon of religion if not the manifestation of spiritual gravitation towards God -- i.e., towards the centre of spiritual gravitation of the world?"

We cannot see gravity, any more than we can observe the wind. However, we can obviously feel the effects of gravity and wind. On the interior plane, these effects are subtle but nevertheless clear, especially as one learns to amplify them and to live within their attractor space. It's as clear as falling in love. No one teaches us how to do that, for it is not something we could ever learn. If it didn't occur in earliest infancy, it couldn't recur later on.

Speaking of falling, Tomberg situates mankind's fall within this space. i.e., "the passage from a spiritual gravitation system, whose centre is God, to a terrestrial gravitational system, whose centre is the serpent."

That's certainly how it feels to me. Don't you feel those twin pulls? And don't you remember as a child, the first awareness of the pull into darkness? I remember it distinctly. I think it repeats itself in different forms at different stages of life -- assuming one actually grows through different developmental stages beyond the culturally conditioned ego of the Mass Man. Each stage has a central "temptation" which is a fractal image of the first. In each case, we must choose the Light.

The Gospel designates the two attractors as "heaven" and "this world," or "the kingdom of God" and "the kingdom of the prince of this world." Or again, we could just call them O and Ø; or "slack" and "the conspiracy." Or liberal and progressive (HT American Digest).

Likewise, this can be thought of as a sword that cuts mankind right down the middle, between the "children of this world" and "the children (or the sons) of light." Here again, standard issue cʘʘnvision -- so long as we haven't voided the warranty -- allows us to know in an instant when we are in the presence of the One or the Øther. It couldn't be more obvious now, could it?

Tomberg notes that there are actually three main categories, and I see that these correspond to the three gunas of Vedanta, which we won't get into. But there is the "carnal" (or vital) man who "lives in the grip of gravitation of 'this world' at the expense of the gravitation of 'heaven'"; there is the "psychic man" who "lives in equilibrium between the two fields"; and then there is the spiritual or pneumatic man "who lives under the sway of the gravitation of 'heaven.'"

Frankly, I no longer have any patience for the the first type, who, like barbarians ransacking a cathedral, are "fundamentally transforming" the country into their own vulgar image. Just part of this toxic cloud I've been passing through, I guess. You know the feeling: let the dead bury the tenured, after throttling the latter with the entrails of the last MSM journalist.


Gagdad Bob said...

MSM journalists. What would we do without them?

mushroom said...

Jesus said that no one could come to Him unless drawn by the Father.

Here again, this is why liberty is so critical to the articulation and development of the self. The self is something that pre-exists in the form of potential, but can only develop and be known through experience.

It looks like we are being challenged to live out our liberty in an atmosphere of increasing oppression.

julie said...

Re. the MSM journalists, without them we might actually have a conservative populace. Or at least a better informed one, anyway...

JP said...

"One can always paper over discontinuities, inconsistencies, holes, psychic envelopes, dead spots, unborns, etc., but there is a technical term for this: papering over, I guess."

I really like this sentence.

JP said...

And in case anyone was wondering, I went ahead a Googled "terminal moraine of the senses".

I got 8 hits.

First one was in 2008.

I don't like that phrase as much as "prisoners of their own neurology", though.


Gagdad Bob said...

Proof that it must mean something.

Gagdad Bob said...

I have quite a few box sets, but this one I just got of Peter Green is among the best. I've only listened to the first three discs, but not a weak track yet.

I don't know why Clapton got all the attention, because Green is much better.

Christina M said...

I have a huge poster of the cathedral of Cologne hanging on my wall. I was pulling on my stockings yesterday, looking at my two legs, pointing down, and I glanced up at the poster as I was pulling up the stockings, and it suddenly hit me that the cathedral of Cologne looks exactly like the Hanged Man. The two towers are the legs pointing up towards heaven and the head is down below, under the ground.

mushroom said...

Part of it was that Green was not quite a stable person during the period of time he should have been succeeding commercially and making a name for himself. You could say the same thing, though, about a lot of very talented musicians.

Maybe it had something to do with Green following Clapton with the Bluesbreakers. I was fairly young back then, but I heard a lot more Yardbirds and Cream in the late '60s/early '70s than I did early Fleetwood Mac.

ge said...

Mind is God
with no human qualities
It does everything --we do nothing.

'In actuality, though, even the fires of hell do not burn'
everybody--everything is a projection of Mind...people places things like dreams evanescent, un-there, [there-there... there is no there there, there is no there anywhere] but ineffable arisings-- vanishing imaginings

thus as oft as you please
click your heels and burst out laughing
stumbling into treasures
ignoring imperfections
cause they're all projections
from mind unfindable

...isn't that something?
it's invaluable

[Dzogchen soaked poem #??...quote: Longchenpa]

ge said...

I might name a few fave non-heroic guitar heros of mine:
syd barrett
ron elliott [Beau Brummells]
early Zappa
Tom Verlaine of Television [has that man ever touched an acoustic guitar? -hard to imagine]

ps re above post, the quote is actually written by Dudjom Lingpa, whose century-old book i just finished BUDDHAHOOD WITHOUT MEDITATION* has the form of his reporting meditative meetings and instructions from various figures from the tibetan as if Bob were to do a book where each chapter 'channels' utterly believable & stylistically matching paragraphs from Tomberg, then from Schuon, then Jung, etc ! The trick is actually getting the reader [as i did above!] to believe the original is speaking.

*i found free at osbooks, ebook library

Gagdad Bob said...

'Shroom: The thing is, Clapton peaked in 1970 with Layla, after which he descended into heroin addiction, which is around the same time Green went cuckoo. The difference is that since then Clapton has done nothing but sub-Phil Collins elevator music, whereas Green continued to be a vital artist into the 2000s. That's what surprised me about the box, since I had never heard any of his post-crack up music. Good review at All Music Guide, with song samples...

River Cocytus said...


Seems all very vague to me. The poem is reminiscent of Christian Science... not a positive association in my reckoning. Your mileage may vary.

mushroom said...

That's true about Clapton. It hardly seems possible that the guy playing the solo on 'Sunshine of Your Love' did 'You Look Wonderful Tonight'?

Gagdad Bob said...

It's very hard to do credible rock & roll past the age of 30, at least with dignity intact. The ones with real artistry, like Van Morrison, evolve into different forms of expression. The hacks just keep trying to do the same thing -- e.g., the Stones or Aerosmith -- or else degenerate into mainstream pap, e.g., McCartney, Elton John, Rod Stewart, et al.

ge said...

Thanks for freedblack;
yup one might say Dzogchen is like a space ship of Mind; Brunton's mentalism a jet liner of, & MBEddy's system a training-wheels bicycle thereof; I know many here are ever-more-staunchly exclusively eso. Xtian anti-Kantians [& Warhol-doubters]
but contrasting ways can be f-u-n.
+ Mentalistic systems are at least anti-materialist, which most 'coonians are aligned with, I am glad Dzogchen pushes that to the limit and helps purge one of remnant persistencies of dualistic materialism

alas no longer downloadable at