Even in pain, missing one knee, and wobbly from hydrocodone, Dr. Sanity can still stand on her other leg and somehow simultaneously use it to knee the enemies of liberty where it would count if only they had a pair. In any event, don't try that move at home unless you're a member of Cirque du Soleil.
Dr. Sanity sites a wonderfully ill-luminating (“shining a light on illness”) post at dailykos, extolling the progressive nature of the Iranian demonocracy. Unlike some fascist Christian theocracies,
“Iran has invested its oil wealth in universal education, healthcare, infrastructure bringing clean water and electricity to more than 98 percent of its people, and economic progress. Military spending is a paltry $91 per capita compared to more than $1,500 per capita in the United States and Israel. The social and economic achievements of the revolutionary regime in Iran in the past 25 years look quite progressive in reducing poverty and social inequalities, and as the society liberalizes toward a more secular democratic regime, even better progress can be expected in the future. Compared to rising inequality in the United States and Israel, ranked numbers one and two for social inequality among developed nations, the Iranians look pretty damn good.”
Nevertheless, “the usual crowd can be expected to comment on women, gays and political dissidents as being targets for repression in Iran. Without minimizing the issues, I'm not convinced that the case isn't overstated and that the repression isn't outweighed by wider social advances. Women and children rarely suffer the isolation, poverty and violence in Iran that so many suffer from family breakdown in America. Women in Iran are now universally educated, taking 65 percent of university places, marrying later, having fewer children, and driving social change. Even Iran has a vibrant gay subculture. The United States imprisons a higher proportion of its population than Iran (or any other nation) does, and that proportion continues to rise despite falling crime rates.”
First of all, no, this is not parody. Rather, this is the base of the Democratic party, the exceedingly base base that thinks you voted for them just because you rejected the Republican party. They have no objection to getting kosy with the Iranian regime. After all, they are fellow travelers, in that they both travel backward and call it progress.
As an asnide, everyone thinks the left is just being cynical in undermining the war on terror, but there's a greater principle involved. That is, if they change their normal behavior and stop trying to weaken the nation, it's like the terrorists have won. Making us less safe is their way of really sticking it to the terrorists. So, as Dr. Sanity reminds us,
“The fact that [Iran’s] president is the actual intellectual heir of Adolf Hitler is irrelevant; the fact that Iran actually IS a religious theocracy is of no matter. What is reality, after all, when compared to the fantasy universe of their feelings, where Bush = Hitler and the U.S. is imminently going to have a Christian theocracy imposed upon it! What does it matter that a few gays are strung up and hanged by the neck until dead, when we are dealing with such important ‘progressive’ ideas that are hallmarks of Iranian justice system. It is even possible for such moral degenerates to convince themselves that there is more oppression of women, children and gays right here in the U.S.! The idea that these wonderful, advanced and civilized people, who rape women daring to go out without the proper clothing, are more socially progressive than we neanderthals in the West, is a concept that only the left is stupid enough to embrace.”
But for Horizontal Man, since he has no “spiritual” needs -- being that he can have no soul -- the only measure of the good society is how well it meets the needs of the physical body and the collective -- the latter being its own absolute god, consistent with the dictates of cultural relativism. Thus, just as in the socialist paradise of Cuba or the USSR, everyone is educated. It matters not that their education specifically involves miseducation. Since all truth is relative anyway, what difference does it make? Here in the west we have our own tenurmites who eat away at the foundation of civilization and call it “education.”
These acadhimmis and crockademics know that it is our own arrogant cultural insensitivity -- ignorance, really -- that prevents us from seeing the rich beauty of the Iranian regime. It reminds me of that book I cited a while back -- you know, the Muslim Book of Virtues, by an imam who is sort of the William Bennett of the Islamic world -- except in his case, his only serious gambling involved marrying one of his wives before seeing what her face looked like (which is, after all, why they allow more than one to a customer). Here are a few "wise old Islamic sayings" from the book that I think are particularly relevant to our discussion. These are almost clichés in the Islamic world, but they are probably new to you:
“Sticks and stones will break your bones if your words should ever humiliate me.”
“If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try to blame the Jews.”
“Fool me once, death to you. Fool me twice? Ain’t gonna happen.”
“A penny saved will help finance a martyrdom operation.”
“There's something rotten in Denmark. Free speech.”
“Give a Palestinian a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give him refugee camps and UN handouts, and he'll steal your fish forever.”
“A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Period.”
“One picture is worth a thousand riots.”
“Ask me no questions and I will tell you lies just for the hell of it.”
“The race doesn't always go the swift, but to the sneaky and duplicitous.”
“Good fences make it more difficult to kill your neighbors.”
“If it's broke, we have no idea how to fix it.”
“If you can't beat 'em, at least try to kill and maim as many of their children as possible.”
“If you can't say anything nice, Grand Ayatollah Khamemei just might select you to be the President of Iran.”
“It's not whether you win or lose, it's how much meaningless suffering you can inflict.”
“Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, the wretched refuse of your teeming deserts. They will make excellent suicide bombers.”
Now that I’m just free-associating, I am reminded of the excellent children's book Mommy is a Democrat. Here are a few gems pulled out at random:
“Ask not what your country can do for you. Instead, pack the Supreme Court with activist judges and make it an entitlement.”
“It's not how you play the game, so long as no one wins or loses and gets their feelings hurt.”
“A fool and someone else's money can solve any societal problem.”
“If life gives you lemons, file a class action suit against Sunkist.”
“A person is known by the company he boycotts.”
“When the going gets tough, the tough start leaking.”
“Beggars can't be choosers. Rather, they're now called ‘homeless.’”
“Boys will be boys, at least until government provides subsidized ritalin for every last one of them.”
“Regardless of your background, any American who really works hard at it can still be a victim.”
Hey, I know I’m offensive. But you can’t judge me, because you need to be more sensitive to redneck psychologist culture.
By the way, I happen to agree with dailykos about the superiority of the Iranian healthcare system. Did you know that every woman in Iran has complete coverage for forced clitoridectomies?
Muslim girls are also more physically fit than ours. I read a study that says that in some Muslim countries, sixty percent of the girls are forced to undergo clitoridectomies. Impressively, this means that forty percent of the girls can run faster than their brothers.
And the Iranians are still pushing ahead with their Manhattan Project. Of course, they say they're only developing nuclear reactors for peaceful purposes. Personally I'd feel better about it if they had figured out peaceful applications for rocks and belts. For them, it's a wardrobe malfunction when some boob doesn't explode out of his vest. But as they say, "better to light a single stick of dynamite than to curse the darkness."
Of course, if only Jon Carry had been elected, we wouldn’t be having this problem with Iran. Unlike Bush, he would have bent over forwards to get along with the mullahs.
Speaking of Iranian democracy, that's what you call a farce only a mullah could love.
Of course, Our Friends the Saudis couldn’t be more pleased with the results of our recent election. Every time they saw Speaker Pelosi’s face on al Jazeera, they serenaded her with chorus after chorus of Wahhabi Days are Here Again. Then again, they have no way of knowing that Pelosi's face always looks that surprised.
Did you know that none of the maps in Iran show Israel? That's what they mean when they refer to their "roadmap to peace."
And why do they hate us so much, anyway? True, without U.S. interference, the Islamic world wouldn't be stuck in the fourteenth century. Instead, they'd be right where they want to be, mired in the twelfth.
But you know what? At least Iran has a vibrant gay culture. Or at least it did until dailykos let the cat out of the burqa. I'm guessing that when the mullahs find out, they'll do what we did to the b'aath houses in Iraq....
Speaking of cats, did you hear that Cat Stevens is releasing his first album since his conversion to Islam over 25 year ago? Before he became a Muslim, he wrote the music for the film Harold and Maude, the story of a morbid, death-obsessed young man bent on killing himself to get back at others. The more things change....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
The only thing missing from this post is the "pah dum dum" drum beat after each line! Sometimes you just gotta laugh, it's better than crying!
Hey Bob y Bobbleheads, I think I may have just found a religion more stupid and sick than Islam...
http://www.viceland.com/int/
v13n10/htdocs/american.php?country=us
The fundamentals of Aghor is the name not sure if they really meant Abhor...eating rotting human penises, food for thought, eh?
A very wise rabbi once took some folks to task for Straining Gnats and Swallowing Camels. I used to think the Christian fundies were the modern-day Strainer/Swallowers, but the secular left redefines the concept.
Thaks for the link, Lisa.
Now I have to wash my eyes out with bleach and purge my computer cache.
;P
JWM
Sorry JWM to startle you, but look on the bright side....makes our own personal problems and difficulties a bit more easy to handle! ;0)
"The United States imprisons a higher proportion of its population than Iran (or any other nation) does, and that proportion continues to rise despite falling crime rates.”
This epitomizes logical leftist thinking. The fact that more criminals are imprisoned has no effect on crime rates- in fact crime rates are completely divorced from how many criminals are jailed! Let's let all prisoners out and see how far the crime rate falls!
... as Bugs would say, 'MAROONS.'
Let us not even mention the jail-less punishments for crimes in Iran er, stoning, amputation, beheading etc. I'm sure the 'vibrant' Iranian gay community is vibrating from fear.
Now if we in this country would just stop jailing folks for victimless 'crimes,' we'd have more room in prison for the truly dangerous and our prison population would shrink. (Excuse my Libertarian streak.)
Say, Bob, Funny!
Post a Comment