Wednesday, November 19, 2014

The Last Honest Liberal vs. The Spiritual Lepers

I'm starting to think Gruber is an angel sent by heaven on a divine mission:

(Here's another good summary of his angelic work.)

Everything I have ever written about the left is encrapsulated in this story, which reveals the corruption at the heart of the media-academic-government complex. Each is rotten to the core, but is kept from collapsing on itself by leaning on the other two for support. For example, a non-corrupt media would have exposed Obama's rot before he could even have become a viable candidate. Likewise, a non-corrupt academia would never have borne Obama upward on wings of affirmative action and neo-Marxian ideology.

Look at the end of the second video, in which the honest man, Bret Baier, is attempting to pry truth from the dishonest man, Obama. Not only can it not be done, but Obama becomes edgy and indignant, when by all rights it should be the other way around.

I have seen this behavior innumerable times in the context of evaluating people who are attempting to defraud the workers comp system. An honest person welcomes scrutiny, whereas the dishonest person attempts to push away compassion and curiosity by aggressively filling the space with his narrative. Attempt to probe the narrative, and the patient will indignantly react as if you don't believe him, or as if you are conducting an aggressive cross examination on the witness stand.

In other words, the transitional space -- AKA the intersubjective space between two human beings -- is flooded with what Bion called beta elements, or raw, unmetabolized emotion. The reason it is unmetabolized is that it necessarily exists outside the more "refined" narrative; or, there is the unreal narrative accompanied by the real emotion, and the two are at odds. You essentially say to yourself: "if he's saying x, why is he feeling y? And why is y being directed at me? I didn't do anything."

What is so refreshing about Gruber is that he is the Last Honest Liberal -- or at least the last honest one I've ever encountered.

To be perfectly accurate, there are actually many honest liberals. We call them conservatives. True, there are many conservatives who were once liberals mugged by reality. But countless others, like myself, are former liberals appalled by the deception, illogic, and agenda-driven approach to reality, whereby evidence that doesn't fit the narrative is either ignored, or, if it persists, aggressively attacked.

It is instructive to consider how prominent liberals are reacting to the "simple truth" -- the naked factuality -- of Gruber. It's like the five stages of death, although most of them can't get past denial and anger -- mostly at conservatives for bearing the message. The genius economist they once put on a pedestal is now being demeaned and devalued like a self-aggrandizing intern, except this intern has received millions of dollars of taxpayer funds for the hard work of lying to the people paying his fees.

It's quite perverse, because if he had ever told the truth to the people paying his fees, then the fees would immediately stop, as now they have. He will never earn another dime from the state, because he has committed the unforgivable the crime of TELLING THE TRUTH. I mean, it's fine to drop the mask in the presence of fellow leftists, but not with the microphone on or the camera running!

After denial and anger comes bargaining, and I have already seen some of this. For example, a host on MSNBC, in true Stalinist fashion, conceded that Gruber said what he said, but hey, isn't it ironic how great the bill has turned out?! So, what's a few broken eggs if we ended up with this fabulous omelet in the process! But really, that's just denial in disguise, a refusal to look at what the bill has done, is doing, and will do, especially when the deliberately backloaded deceptions kick in. (I see that the New Yorker takes the same lying approach to bargaining the lies away.)

The other day, Ace of Spades had a link to a short piece on how one can spot a Lie. One of the rules of thumb goes to what was said above about beta elements: liars supposedly "feel subconsciously guilty about their lie (or at least uncomfortable at being in the position of lying)," and consequently "add in unnecessary negative emotional language into their lie."

I suppose that is sometimes true, although I would frame it somewhat differently. I would say that the liar necessarily divides his soul. In order to utter the lie, he must deny the very purpose of the mind, which is to know truth. Now, one cannot deny the purpose of any organ without suffering adverse consequences. Just as the wrong type of diet may redound to, say, heart disease, the wrong type of discourse will result in soul pathology. In soul pathology there must be pain, but the really sick person forces others to feel the pain.

This pathology can become so advanced that the person is no longer capable of "feeling" the barbs that occur when he deviates from truth. Obama is at this stage: like a leper who can no longer feel his extremities, and ends up causing them so much damage that they must be amputated, Obama -- and Reid and Pelosi and all the rest -- have such advanced cases of spiritual leprosy that they no longer even know when they are lying. They have become insensate to the epistemophilic pangs of conscience. Consider how they deny even knowing who Gruber is, when there is such extensive evidence to the contrary.

Another important point about lying -- not just the occasional fib, but someone truly immersed in the Lie -- is that it always partakes of omnipotence. It is as if the real liar believes that his lies have the power to shape reality.

Which they do! Consider how the media-academic-state complex managed to impose this monumental lie-of-a-bill -- literally, the greatest consumer fraud in history -- on the citizenry! We are only having this discussion because someone couldn't help himself from telling the truth about it.

Oddly enough, this was the healthy part of Gruber -- the corner of his soul that is somehow still in tact. Yes, part of the motivation was no doubt self-aggrandization, but nevertheless, truth has hijacked stranger things in order to escape into the world.

Another telltale sign of lying: liars "are forced to make up stories, and when they do make them up, they tend to be very simple, straightforward tales. Their stories tend not to have complexity and implied background details of stories about real events."

Here again, I've seen this pattern many times in cases of workers comp fraud. As to Gruber, consider the rich detail in his accounts of visits with Obama (e.g., he paused for a cigaret), vs. Obama's simplistic denials, or his assurances that everything about the bill was "transparent." None of what he says has the ring of truth. It's too cleverly simple by half.

But at the same time, the simplistic story may be couched in overly convoluted language. This has been one of Obama's trademarks from the beginning. Supporters hailed it as "nuance," but this is more like the nuance of a corrupt defense attorney defending an obviously guilty client. It is the oily nuance of Johnnie Cohchran.

Liars seem to realize "that something is missing from their stories -- that their stories aren't life-like, in being so simple -- and attempt to pad them out by using convoluted language, and irrelevant parenthetical details, to make them appear more complex than they actually are."

Truth is simple. Defenses against it are not. Likewise, Gruber's confessions are as straightforward as one could possibly hope for. But dropping truth into the left is like stepping onto an anthill and watching the ants freak out in all directions before settling back into their orderly patterns. At the moment the left is struggling to keep its drones in line, but new shoes keep dropping on the hive every day. Give them a couple weeks.

23 Comments:

Blogger julie said...

An honest person welcomes scrutiny, whereas the dishonest person attempts to push away compassion and curiosity by aggressively filling the space with his narrative.

That's a good point; how often do we find ourselves, knowing we're being put on the spot and are ready with the truth, actively feeling disappointed when the expected scrutiny doesn't happen? Which is actually more likely, simply because our very eagerness demonstrates that in fact, we have nothing to hide and thus nothing "of interest" for the scrutinizer. Conversely, when we're trying to get away with something the last thing we want is for anyone to take a closer look, and when it happens anyway successful obfuscation becomes key.

11/19/2014 09:25:00 AM  
Blogger Gagdad Bob said...

Truth dropped right on the führerbunker.

11/19/2014 09:29:00 AM  
Blogger mushroom said...

I would say that the liar necessarily divides his soul. In order to utter the lie, he must deny the very purpose of the mind, which is to know truth.

"To thine own self be true, and it must follow, as night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man."

You are right. Whatever those guys are feeling, it is not guilt. To say they feel guilty to assume that evil cannot fully engulf a heart.

11/19/2014 09:34:00 AM  
Blogger mushroom said...

This post is rich. The denials are getting like the scenes in an old "I Love Lucy" where Lucy's trying to hide a horse or something from Ricky. Next thing you know, they'll start wailing and crying.

11/19/2014 09:40:00 AM  
Blogger Gagdad Bob said...

Definitely a Teachable Moment.

11/19/2014 09:51:00 AM  
Blogger Gagdad Bob said...

At least if the teachers weren't so corrupt.

11/19/2014 09:52:00 AM  
Blogger Van Harvey said...

"...I suppose that is sometimes true, although I would frame it somewhat differently. I would say that the liar necessarily divides his soul. In order to utter the lie, he must deny the very purpose of the mind, which is to know truth. Now, one cannot deny the purpose of any organ without suffering adverse consequences. Just as the wrong type of diet may redound to, say, heart disease, the wrong type of discourse will result in soul pathology. In soul pathology there must be pain, but the really sick person forces others to feel the pain...."

Ahhh. Tonic. Nothing to add, just wanted another shot of it.

11/19/2014 11:10:00 AM  
Blogger Rogelio Bueno said...

Bob,
I'm guessing you've already seen this, but just in case:
http://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/12/deathless-truths

11/19/2014 12:14:00 PM  
Blogger Magister said...

Those Hitler videos about Obama never get old.

11/19/2014 01:02:00 PM  
Blogger Gagdad Bob said...

Rogelio: No, I had not seen that, nor could I stop myself from immediately ordering a copy.

¡Viva la Reactión!

11/19/2014 03:01:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

Brett Baier is a good example of what a journalist should aspire to.
He is one of the rare ones that goes after the truth with tenacity and fervor.

11/19/2014 05:12:00 PM  
Blogger Rogelio Bueno said...

Provecho.
Joan is the source. I'm only the chanel.

11/19/2014 05:14:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

"This post is rich. The denials are getting like the scenes in an old "I Love Lucy" where Lucy's trying to hide a horse or something from Ricky. Next thing you know, they'll start wailing and crying."

Aye, if only it was as funny. I mean, in a sense it is, however a lot of good people who don't deserve it get hurt by this fascism that the majority of the left hope for.


11/19/2014 05:18:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

That guy who plays Hitler is absolutely brilliant!

11/19/2014 05:19:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

I'm referring to the actor in the video, not Obama.

11/19/2014 05:20:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

Wow, Megyn Kelly is on fire tonight! She's really tearing Obama to pieces...with his own words.
Bravo Zulu!

11/19/2014 06:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Rogelio's Muse said...

I have seen this behavior innumerable times in the context of evaluating people who are attempting to defraud the workers comp system.

Seven days into my new position as a bureaucrat and I'm already seeing this behavior from one of our contractors. I have to either assume she is totally ignorant, or that she it using a tactic. When confronted with solid facts (politely as possible to say, "No. You're wrong.") in reply to her daily aggressive inquiries, she responds with "please be advised" terms for each bullet-point to the effect of, "I didn't do anything wrong."

She's either a shame-based unorganized business manager in wa-a-a-ay over her head, or she is accustomed to dealing with gov't 'crats who merely respond to bullying and just overpay her.

Let the subversive Truth games begin!

11/19/2014 07:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Rogelio's Muse said...

New boss: Oh, Asheville is wonderful! You can see so much culture, participate in a drum circle, join a group blessing..
Me:*
Boss: so this one girl asked me why hippies always smell so awful. It's patchouli! I told her.
Me: *noting the patchouli candle on his shelf* Oh, hah!
Boss: Asheville is a wonder. You have to go.
Me: Yeah, so about that t.p. report...

11/20/2014 04:08:00 AM  
Blogger julie said...

Ugh - patchouli. It may be a decent smell in small doses, but I wouldn't know because I don't think I've ever come across anyone who used it in small doses. Did know a guy in college, though, who used so much of it that one of his dorm rooms still reeked of it a year after he had moved out.

Heh - I've been reading about the special oils and incenses used for the Tabernacle, and the importance of fragrance in connection to holiness.

Patchouli is like holy oil for hippies. It sets them apart and marks them as being part of a very specific tribe. As such, it's like a nasal shorthand for "this guy worships trees and crystals, believes in magic spells, and has a deep-seated mistrust for anything normal."

11/20/2014 05:56:00 AM  
Blogger mushroom said...

I always preferred Gonesh #9 "perfumes of a spring mist" (IIRC) to cover the smell of burning cannabis. I haven't seen it for years, but I haven't needed it for years.

11/20/2014 07:38:00 AM  
Blogger Rick said...

"Ugh - patchouli"

That should be a T-shirt.

11/20/2014 08:49:00 AM  
Blogger Rick said...

"..participate in a drum circle"

And Christianity is dismissed as too weird, or, can't possibly be true.

11/20/2014 08:53:00 AM  
Blogger Rick said...

Incidentally, there is a good (and brief) chapter in Metaxas' book "Miracles" that examines the Resurrection event in a way I've never seen done before. He looks at the motives of everyone involved. Whether the body was stolen, and such.
The best part of the book, I thought.

11/20/2014 09:02:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home