Tuesday, August 14, 2007

The Fall From Reality into Realism

Continuing from yesterday’s post, we are tracing the dialectic of nihilism in the postmodern world through the stages of liberalism --> realism --> vitalism --> nihilistic destruction, as outlined by Father Seraphim Rose.

(Probably going to be summer re-runs for awhile -- next week I have jury duty, unless I can convince the judge that I so loath criminal defense attorneys that I cannot be trusted to sit on a jury. Yes, yes, I know there are some ethical ones... By the way, be assured that each repost is carefully edited, often for the first time, with some additional giggles inserted here and there.)

As reader Alan pointed out yesteryear, hardcore traditionalists tend to prefer monarchy as the proper form of government, and although this is undoubtedly a nonstarter for Americans, the traditionalists have their reasons. I may discuss those reasons later, and although I must ultimately reject them, I certainly appreciate where they’re coming from.

Traditionalists are concerned with adamn ineveateapple dark side of democracy -- demagoguery, the tyranny of the stupid and emotional, the plummeting of standards, the loss of the spiritual center of civilization -- the horror of a huffing kosocracy run by hillariously obaminable olbermen without chests and other male organs, to be precise. The question of how we reconcile tradition and progress is an absolutely critical one, so perhaps I will address it after we rise from our four-part fall into nihilism. The future of civilization will depend upon how we balance the two -- which is to say, the One and the many.

Let us stipulate that religion deals with absolute truth, or at least purports to do so. In the end, in the absence of absolute truth, the only option left open to one is nihilism, because nihilism is simply the doctrine of relativity drawn out to its logical conclusion. There really is no middle ground. An honest nihilist such as Nietzsche realizes this: “God is dead and therefore man becomes God and everything is possible.”

In the final analysis, the existence of God is the only thing that prevents honestly dishonest human beings from inevitably coming to Nietzsche’s stark conclusion: “I am God and all is permitted.” Nietzsche also knew full well that once the appeal to absolute truth is vitiated, raw power comes in to fill the void. Such is the law of the Darwinner & loserman cosmic jungle.

Scientific or logical truth is always relative truth. Thanks to Gödel, we know that there is no system of logic that can fully account for itself or that can be both coherent and complete. Rather, completeness is always purchased at the price of consistency, while a rigidly consistent system will always be incomplete -- say, a consistent program of materialism or determinism. Such a philosophy will leave most of reality -- including the most interesting cats -- outside its purrview. This is why Marxism (and all the leftist ideologies that flow from it) is such an inadequate theory. In explaining everything, it explains nothing. But at least it’s consistent, like Darwinian fundamentalism, and provides a kind of insecurity blanket to the metaphysically blind and deaf.

But if there is no absolute there is only the relative, incoherent though that philosophy may be (for the existence of relativity, or degrees of being, proves the absolute, since the relative can only be assessed and judged -- or even perceived -- in light of the absolute). For example, in the face of the the absolute we are able to judge various cultures on the basis of their proximity to the ideal. But once we have effaced the absolute and descended into relativity, then what necessarily follows is multiculturalism, moral relativism, deconstruction, “perception is reality,” etc. All cultures become equally cherished, with the exception of the culture that believes some cultures are better. All truths are privileged with the exception of Truth itself. Belief in Truth itself is "authoritarian" or "fascist."

In the relative world of nihilism, the local and contingent I is necessarily all. The world literally revolves around me, since my truth is absolute. The ultimate questions have no answers except for those I might provide. This is why leftist academia has become so corrupt, for how can it not be corrupting "to hear or read the words of men who do not believe in truth?” “It is yet more corrupting to receive, in place of truth, mere learning and scholarship which, if they are presented as ends in themselves, are no more than parodies of the truth they were meant to serve, no more than a facade behind which there is no substance” (Rose).

The emptiness of relativism evokes the next stage in the nihilist dialectic, realism. This is an entirely new kind of realism, for, prior to modernity, it had referred to any philosophy which affirmed the self-evident reality of transcendental categories such as truth, love, and beauty. In short, it testified to the reality of the vertical. But this new type of debased realism entirely excluded the vertical, and affirmed that only the horizontal realm was real -- that is, the material, external, and quantifiable world. In one fool swap, a philosophy of unreality became the parastigmatic lens through which mankind was now to view the world.

At the beginning of my book there is a relevant quote from Richard Weaver: “The modernistic searcher after meaning may be likened to a man furiously beating the earth and imagining that the finer he pulverizes it, the nearer he will get to the riddle of existence. But no synthesizing truths lie in that direction. It is in the opposite direction that the path must be followed.” Nevertheless, it is in this downward direction that our fall inevitably takes us.

Here philosophy is officially replaced by modern misosophy: the hatred of wisdom. It is a childishly naive ideology that confuses what is most obvious with what is most true and what is most fundamental with what is most real. The cosmos is officially turned upside-down and inside-out, bizarrely elevating insentient matter to the the ultimate. This is certainly intellectual nihilism, but we have a ways to go before we hit bottom, which we will proceed to do in my next two posts.

As Father Rose writes, “Worship of fact is by no means the love of truth; it is, as we have already suggested, parody. It is the presumption of the fragment to replace the whole; it is the proud attempt to build a Tower of Babel, a collection of facts, to reach to the heights of truth and wisdom from below. But truth is only attained by bowing down and accepting what is received from above. All the pretended ‘humility’ of Realist scholars and scientists... cannot conceal the pride of their collective usurpation of the throne of God...”

Such an individual “becomes a fanatical devotee of the only reality that is obvious to the spiritually blind: this world.” Human beings are reduced to races or classes, spiritual love to animal sex, higher needs to lower desires, while the earth is elevated to Goddess, the dramatic to the significant, the celebrity to the important. Again, if God is dead, there is only this world, and all is permitted in it. A new kind of human monster is born, who takes his place a bit lower than the beasts. It is Vital Man, who would be surreal if he weren't so subreal, and whom we shall discuss in the next post.

11 Comments:

Blogger Robin Starfish said...

Song of Seraphim
as new darkness falls
souls revolve around true north
star of the morning

8/14/2007 10:46:00 AM  
Anonymous hoarhey said...

Bob,
I was looking at this quote from Nietzsche; “God is dead and therefore man becomes God and everything is possible.” and trying to see it through the eyes of the modern "progressive".
The modern "progressive" being unhappy with his lot without knowledge of his own responsibility for that unhappiness and totally clueless to his darkened nature sees the quote and believes, "ahhhh, if we can just get rid of God, utopia on earth is possible and my sorry-assed life will be made perfect and whole" in the manner a child might believe in magic. He doesn't realize that he is replacing God with himself and that due his lack of objective self awareness, the unintended consequences of his vision upon the world will follow along the lines of his darkened vision getting "progressively" more barbaric as the new god tries to change the world to fit his image and likeness while rejecting the only entity capable of saving him from his own degenerate self.

And speaking of "progressive", those of you with "Progressive" Insurance, do an internet search with the names Peter Lewis and George Soros and see what you come up with. (Peter Lewis being the President of "Progressive" Insurance) They don't call it "Progressive" Insurance for nothin'.

8/14/2007 12:37:00 PM  
Blogger Joey said...

I've got jury duty too! maybe we'll be jury-mates..

8/14/2007 03:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Biker Lady said...

I don't know which "Towers of Babel" are doing the most harm, the media, the churches, hollywood, the politicans, our schools?
I think it would have to be the anything goes churches who have managed to create their own little Utopia's (some not so little since they're living high).
Next would be the politicans, the schools and the media.
These people think they control the world and are, in fact, a law unto themselves.
I'll stop here. Great articles Bob.
It seems that your articles get me to thinking and things pop into my mind. Next thing I know it's like you're reading my mind!
It's a hopeful, soul satisfying feeling. You don't feel like you are so alone in this world. Well, we know God is there, ever present, and in control over the fools and all their towers of babbleloney.
Thanks for the posts Bob.

8/14/2007 03:41:00 PM  
Anonymous gnostic713 said...

It's become oddly clear to me that either Christianity is true or nihilism is. If you extend out the "logic" of most "philosophy" since Descartes it seems to land one exactly where Nietzsche did.

Coming from an agnostic upbringing and "deconstructionist/pomo" college education (I majored in music so thankfully I missed out on a lot of the nonsense that my English major roommates got bombarded with. In music you're pretty much either good or not...nothing really to deconstruct. Besides, those of us hip to the overtone series and it's relation to music, perhaps like those in the related field of mathematics, are closet Platonists)

ANYWAY, it's a strange position to be in. I never went in for the more ridiculous aspects of the pomo/pc misophy. But I have never been able to inoculate myself entirely--much to my chagrin. Hence my motto being..."I believe, help my unbelief"

I've been lurking on this blog for months now. I just wanted to thank you all for helping my unbelief.

8/14/2007 04:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The person of the year for Time Magazine last year was YOU--the one dimensional "realist" consumer everyperson who's essential credo and even self-identity is "I Shop Therefore I Am". Catered too and created by "free" market capitalism and propaganidized 24 hours a day by the advertising industry---propaganda central.

Consumer "realism" rules OK!

When did you ever see the advertising industry or TV ask or encourage anyone to ask profound questions about anything.

There is no God to be found in any of that.

8/14/2007 05:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Van said...

"By the way, be assured that each repost is carefully edited, often for the first time, with some additional giggles inserted here and there."

New and improved One Cosmos Soul Food! Fortified with Improved Edits and extra Giggles!

I've got the mental munchies!
;-)

"Here philosophy is officially replaced by modern misosophy: the hatred of wisdom. It is a childishly naive ideology that confuses what is most obvious with what is most true and what is most fundamental with what is most real."

'Not so!' They bray, 'We LOVE facts! LOTS of facts! Brains stuffed to phd-bursting bushels full of facts! We are SOOO much smarter than anyone from Pre-Modern ages - we know WAY more! We've got tons and TONS of Wisdumb!'

“Worship of fact is by no means the love of truth; it is, as we have already suggested, parody. It is the presumption of the fragment to replace the whole; it is the proud attempt to build a Tower of Babel, a collection of facts, to reach to the heights of truth and wisdom from below. But truth is only attained by bowing down and accepting what is received from above. All the pretended ‘humility’ of Realist scholars and scientists... cannot conceal the pride of their collective usurpation of the throne of God...”

A Rose by any other name, would smell as sweet.

8/14/2007 05:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Jim said...

Bob

To get out of jury duty wear a suit coat or sports coat and tie the first day, the defense will ask to have you thrown out of the court room, at least it works where I live

8/14/2007 10:35:00 PM  
Anonymous ximeze said...

Want to make sure everyone has seen the Marine Poetry Slam & read the lyrics. This guy Gets It. Semper Fidelis dude.

Mrs G, here's one for ya.

Those huffNkos weinies must just die when they see it. Too bad. Stick this guy where the sun don't shine you @%$^&!

http://www.badassmarine.com/story.php?
title=YouTube_-_BadAss_Marine-1

8/14/2007 10:55:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

"But if there is no absolute there is only the relative, incoherent though that philosophy may be (for the existence of relativity, or degrees of being, proves the absolute, since the relative can only be assessed and judged -- or even perceived -- in light of the absolute)."

Someone would have to be incoherent to deny that truth.

That was excellent, Ximeze!

8/15/2007 06:35:00 AM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

I would pay real money to see Bob coonfuse an unethical criminal defense attourney during jury selection, lol!

I guess a transcript is out of the question?

8/15/2007 06:45:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home