Peterson was going on in his usual way about the meaning of life being found in the bloody struggle of it all, which led O'Connor to ask how this can be reconciled with the "ultimate meaning" of heaven, where there is no struggle.
This stumped Peterson.
However, it needn't stump us. For starters, there is the ongoing post-mortem purification of purgatory, but even then, it seems the "struggle" isn't over, rather, transposed to a higher key.
Thankfully, not everyone is the same there, rather, there are ranks (for example, Queen). This is actually quite biblical, but I forget where at the moment.
In any event, I just started reading a book called Platonism and Mystical Theology: The Spiritual Doctrine of St Gregory of Nyssa, and it seems he advocated for our position on the subject.
I don't yet know the details, but there are some hints, for example, in the Foreword, which suggests that "the spiritual life both here and in eternity" is "an infinite and perpetual becoming" that
ever more closely approaches and pursues the infinite God, ever reaching out, always being filled, and yet never being sated with the experience and knowledge of God.
I don't know about you, but this comes to me as a relief, since the alternative -- a kind of completely static vision of a static God -- would be eternal boredom? Just asking.
Here is Gregory's answer: "This truly is the vision of God: never to be satisfied in the desire to see him." Rather,
one must always, by looking at what he can see, rekindle his desire to see more. Thus, no limit would interrupt growth in the ascent to God, since no limit to the Good can be found nor is the increasing desire for the Good brought to an end because it is satisfied.
Well, good: there's always more where THAT! came from. What's the word, Petey?
Asymptotic?
Bingo!
Gregory accepts the classic three-stage mystical journey of purification, illumination, and union, only it is as if each of these partakes of the others. Thus, union itself is an ongoing illumination, just as our little bit of illumination on this side of the veil is already a kind of union.
Gregory's thought implies a kind of "evolutionary movement" that is dominated "by the concept of progress."
In this regard, he sees Moses as a kind of prototype of the ascent, from the initial illumination of the burning bush to the purifying crossing of the desert to the dark cloud atop Mount Sinai.It's a kind of endless climb, only not the absurd Sisyphean kind, since there's definitely a top -- a telos -- but it's always just over the vertical horizon.
Thus, "The perpetual renewal of our horizons enables one to avoid the potential monotony of an endless climb," because
"when we arrive at these summits, new horizons open up before us, new realms that present their own peaks. Nor will our journey culminate in the ascent of one final summit, but on the contrary, with the enchanting realization that the countries already discovered are always only promises of lands more beautiful still."
Just like down here, and why not?
To be continued as I get further into the book. Or rather, to be continued, period. Like asymptotically or something, if that's the right word.
2 comments:
I don't know about you, but this comes to me as a relief, since the alternative -- a kind of completely static vision of a static God -- would be eternal boredom? Just asking.
Indeed, the idea of heaven as being a place where everyone just sits around in the clouds for eternity, doing pretty much nothing, seems almost diabolical. Pop culture has seized on and run with the idea that all of the fun, interesting and exciting things actually happen in the other place, and that only boring bland people make it into boring and bland heaven.
Pretty sure that's precisely the opposite of the reality; whatever is happening up there is life beyond life, and thus can't possibly be static and dull.
The problem with so many things down here is that they do end. For example, I'm not sure I've ever really gotten over the end of childhood.
Which gives a new slant on the advice to "be as children," and all that. In general, humans have an infinitely extended neoteny, and perhaps it is literally infinitely extended. Which would be nice.
Post a Comment