tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post2288002972548444740..comments2024-03-28T20:04:20.286-07:00Comments on One Cʘsmos: Why a World?Gagdad Bobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14249005793605006679noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-26806220451941001852018-05-29T13:05:07.914-07:002018-05-29T13:05:07.914-07:00“Ah, a counterworld to the world. You could say th...“Ah, a counterworld to the world. You could say the world descends from God. The counterworld ascends to God. But these are not-two.”<br /><br />The counterworld is the ultimate incounter.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17131472318246441780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-63081733423750555762018-05-29T13:01:00.594-07:002018-05-29T13:01:00.594-07:00“If the archetypes are the forms, what's the s...“If the archetypes are the forms, what's the substance? That's a problem, for it seems to me that Jung subordinates substance to the forms, which is precisely what we are not supposed to do, according to Schuon. This must be why Jungianism devolves to a kind of pseudo-religion.”<br /><br />Went straight to the Jungular! Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17131472318246441780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-81748505180042574912018-05-29T10:25:32.555-07:002018-05-29T10:25:32.555-07:00The Church’s function is not to adapt Christianity...<i>The Church’s function is not to adapt Christianity to the world, nor even to adapt the world to Christianity; her function is to maintain a counterworld in the world.</i><br /><br />Yes, I like that. We are in the world and not of it; just because we are not of it does not mean we get to skip the being in it part.juliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15975754287030568726noreply@blogger.com