tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post2293266948901051693..comments2024-03-28T12:10:26.197-07:00Comments on One Cʘsmos: How Thoughtless of Me!Gagdad Bobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14249005793605006679noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-26124846532133108902007-11-02T09:17:00.000-07:002007-11-02T09:17:00.000-07:00Ha ha! I noticed that "Adam" has that "who, me?" l...Ha ha! I noticed that "Adam" has that "who, me?" look on his face, while "Eve" is totally oblivious, enjoying her apple!<BR/><BR/>I better run before the ladies arrive!<BR/><BR/>Oh yeah, guess what? No...not chicken butt...okay, I' don't have time so I'll just tell y'all:<BR/>I met the remarkable and oh so lovely Mizz E yesterday! <BR/><BR/>I'll write more later, but I'm pullin' double duty today (the Missus is sick). <BR/>Just wanted to whet yer appetites! <BR/><BR/>Great post, Bob!USS Ben USN (Ret)https://www.blogger.com/profile/07492369604790651538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-76044954140659411182007-11-02T07:56:00.000-07:002007-11-02T07:56:00.000-07:00Completely off topic, but can you imagine the crim...Completely off topic, but can you imagine the crime spree a burqa wearing femnoiselambie could get away with? Picture the police line-up... 'Ok ahmed, which of these suspicious looking black burqa's was it that robbed you?'<BR/><BR/>Imagine the secret service detail "Ok, secure the president"<BR/>"I'm the president", "No, I'm the president" "No, I'm the president". Spartacus had nothing on them, every enterprising secret service agent who tried to peak to verify which one should be protected would have to stomped to death by her family... and then of course she would too, what with offended honor and all... talk about term limits.<BR/><BR/>wv:yqhgeegy - hmm<BR/>2nd wv:wkguolh - seems more appropriate.Van Harveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08470413719262297062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-35046693815839195662007-11-02T07:49:00.000-07:002007-11-02T07:49:00.000-07:00"since a word such as "thinking" is so saturated w..."since a word such as "thinking" is so saturated with meaning that people imagine they know what it is just because they have a word for it. But they don't know what thinking is, nor what thinking about thinking is, let alone thinking the unThinkable."<BR/><BR/>WOW, that's good!<BR/>Did Jethro also say to his son "You don't have to take trigonometry in school, I teached you to shoot a gun already"?Ivan Ivanovichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00411332682229690039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-16377426829101657912007-11-02T07:06:00.000-07:002007-11-02T07:06:00.000-07:00"You will have good jobs and all the material amen..."You will have good jobs and all the material amenities but you will not be able to hold positions of responisibility."<BR/><BR/>Finally! An Islamic jobs creation program. I'll be sure to get my name in early so I can help blow up the children.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-4368362283999152372007-11-01T22:50:00.000-07:002007-11-01T22:50:00.000-07:00Ohhh. Hillarity in a big black blanket and Billy B...Ohhh. Hillarity in a big black blanket and Billy Bob in a dirty nightshirt. Too sweet.<BR/><BR/>Aaahlaah SmackbaaaahNoMohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01100042056270224683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-43352771716612841692007-11-01T19:36:00.000-07:002007-11-01T19:36:00.000-07:00Although I'd pay to see Hilary wearing a big black...Although I'd pay to see Hilary wearing a big black blanket for the entire campaign.<BR/><BR/>Bet Bill would too.Van Harveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08470413719262297062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-16241674200933972372007-11-01T19:33:00.000-07:002007-11-01T19:33:00.000-07:00fezpeal,...oof.Sorry, but that one doesn't rate a ...fezpeal,<BR/><BR/>...oof.<BR/><BR/>Sorry, but that one doesn't rate a W.Van Harveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08470413719262297062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-36659674780722947622007-11-01T19:16:00.000-07:002007-11-01T19:16:00.000-07:00Agreed, Jez. Your constitution represents a proble...Agreed, Jez. Your constitution represents a problem.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-55986819511279025732007-11-01T19:10:00.000-07:002007-11-01T19:10:00.000-07:00The biggest difference in an Islamofeminist gynocr...The biggest difference in an Islamofeminist gynocracy is that clitoridectomies would be self-administered.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-54133329313850976992007-11-01T19:05:00.000-07:002007-11-01T19:05:00.000-07:00ximeze, it sounds an awful lot like you just equat...ximeze, it sounds an awful lot like you just equated the ejaculation "Woof!" with a hissy-fit.CrypticLifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05313033952671292402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-79715128197522170682007-11-01T18:57:00.000-07:002007-11-01T18:57:00.000-07:00Bob mentions The Constitution. I agree with him t...Bob mentions The Constitution. I agree with him that it represents a problem.<BR/><BR/>I'm in the "other" camp from the Bobolytes; I'm a bluestate lefty Islamofeminist.<BR/><BR/>I may sound like a conspiracist cliche, but I DO want a New World Order based on Islamofeminism. I absolutely want all males out of power and a gynocracy of Muslim women of color to rule in their stead. To do so in the United States the Constitution will have to be abolished or circumvented.<BR/><BR/>I know what men and white women are thinking--what will our place abe in this new order?<BR/><BR/>You will have good jobs and all the material amenities but you will not be able to hold positions of responisibility.<BR/><BR/>It is not a bad life and perhaps an easier one if you think about it.<BR/><BR/>The undermining of the Constitution will be gradual over the next century and then a peaceful Jihad will usher in the new order.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-15885022426024529712007-11-01T15:50:00.000-07:002007-11-01T15:50:00.000-07:00...and he'd be happy to discuss with you in person......and he'd be happy to discuss with you in person...heh, heh.NoMohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01100042056270224683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-57800356447859295772007-11-01T14:29:00.000-07:002007-11-01T14:29:00.000-07:00I think so, but Dupree insists that he came up wit...I think so, but Dupree insists that he came up with the idea independently.Gagdad Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14249005793605006679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-64955249786108342492007-11-01T14:22:00.000-07:002007-11-01T14:22:00.000-07:00Petey would get Dupree to take out a baseball bat ...<I>Petey would get Dupree to take out a baseball bat at a school district meeting and explain the importance of teamwork.</I><BR/><BR/>Gagster, is that a reference to the infamous Al Capone scene in THE UNTOUCHABLES?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-9469463006551214242007-11-01T12:59:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:59:00.000-07:00Maineman - There's a time for barking and there's ...Maineman - There's a time for barking and there's a time for biting. Sharpen up those teeth and go to it!NoMohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01100042056270224683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-2817136546386244072007-11-01T12:56:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:56:00.000-07:00"The eye with which I see God is the same eye with..."The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which he sees me."<BR/><BR/>Perhaps only if I have the Spirit of God in me - "For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so the thoughts of God no one knows except the Spirit of God." (I Cor 2:11) Also, perhaps only then might true intellection be possible.NoMohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01100042056270224683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-39485285422548626392007-11-01T12:54:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:54:00.000-07:00"It's no use to get into a... a thought fight with...<I>"It's no use to get into a... a thought fight with a thinker, because you're both going to end up covered in thought, the only difference being that the thinker will enjoy it."</I><BR/><BR/>LOL! A rich visual.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://robinstarfish.blogspot.com/2007/11/psalm-23.html" REL="nofollow">Psalm 23</A><BR/>winter storm warning<BR/>wipers scrape a smattered mind<BR/>shadow latitudesrobinstarfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15665546554663005609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-34142564395285983332007-11-01T12:49:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:49:00.000-07:00Nomo, all leftists may be females, but by the grac...Nomo, all leftists may be females, but by the grace of (O) not all females are leftists ;)<BR/><BR/>Maineman, I would hazard a guess that when it comes to ordinary discussion, "Woof" is often the correct response. However, when it comes to extraordinary action, the correct response, one would think (uh-oh!), must also be extraordinary and appropriate action.juliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15975754287030568726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-53592353657387823192007-11-01T12:42:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:42:00.000-07:00Nomo:"They eye with which I see God is the same ey...Nomo:<BR/><BR/>"They eye with which I see God is the same eye with which he sees me."<BR/><BR/>Maineman:<BR/><BR/>Petey would get Dupree to take out a baseball bat at a school district meeting and explain the importance of teamwork.<BR/><BR/>No, you are absolutely right about being rooted in Truth, and then finding a way to make it appeal to logic and reason, which certainly have their legitimate claims to explanation on their own level.Gagdad Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14249005793605006679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-12654832821916759282007-11-01T12:34:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:34:00.000-07:00Now, all of this hits kind of close to home. Up he...Now, all of this hits kind of close to home. Up here in Portland, many of you may know, we're dealing with a dramatic bit of leftist overreach in the form of school dispensed birth control for teeny-boppers. 75% of us know, in the sense of (n), that this is wrong, and it seems to me that there is, in this case, a need to find a way to get (n) translated into (k), because it just won't work to go to the Portland School Committee meeting and say, "Woof!"<BR/><BR/>The point being that there seem to me to be times when thought fights with thinkers are an essential part of slogging our way to higher consciousness down here on the ground. The way it works for me is that I start off with "knowing" that, in this case, the Committee decision is wrong, just like I know that a Beethoven theme is beautiful. Then I try to figure out how to use (k) to communicate this in a way that has impact where the rubber meets the road. <BR/><BR/>For example, we use reason to realize that this is wrong because teeny-bopper sex is a crime in Maine, and this is facilitating illegal activity, and most of us know that "contributing to the delinquency of a minor" is wrong.<BR/><BR/>Doesn't this imply, then, that there are times when having a (k) fight is important and not just futile? Isn't this a way that (n) spreads? Because there is a stance that says passive (n)oing is where it's really at. Which would imply that doing battle with the purveyors of pre-teen sexuality is a waste of time or, worse yet, self-destructive.<BR/><BR/>Believe me, I'd like nothing better than to sit back, contemplate, and let someone else try to change the world, but there's this nagging feeling that I bear some responsibility for how things turn out down here. Is this hubris? Am I jousting at windmills? What would Petey do?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-2219353408646110582007-11-01T12:26:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:26:00.000-07:00Getting back on topic:Psalm 10:4 says, "In their p...Getting back on topic:<BR/><BR/>Psalm 10:4 says, "In their pride the wicked do not seek him; in all their thoughts there is no room for God." Or, I might add, for intellection.<BR/><BR/>Then, there's this from Isaiah, <BR/>"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways," declares the LORD. As the heavens are higher than the earth, <BR/>so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts." (55:8-9).<BR/><BR/>Perhaps human intellection might be thinking God's thoughts after Him. Hmmm, what is God's intellection?NoMohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01100042056270224683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-55311449659533980522007-11-01T12:16:00.000-07:002007-11-01T12:16:00.000-07:00Ximeze - So...leftists are actually all females?Be...Ximeze - So...leftists are actually all females?<BR/><BR/>Better stop right there.NoMohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01100042056270224683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-80861680179156636342007-11-01T11:36:00.000-07:002007-11-01T11:36:00.000-07:00Bob said:"It's no use to get into a... a thought f...Bob said:<BR/>"It's no use to get into a... a thought fight with a thinker, because you're both going to end up covered in thought, the only difference being that the thinker will enjoy it."<BR/><BR/>Er, females have known this for ages.<BR/><BR/>Since you were kind enough to blow The Male Cover, it's only fair to post the other side of that coin.<BR/><BR/>From Kyle-Anne Shiver (AT 10/19/07)<BR/><BR/>"For those of you who might not be familiar with the female hissy-fit, I will attempt to define it. As a Southern female, descended from a long line of Southern belles and femmes fatales, I was myself perfectly schooled in this necessary tactic in the War Between the Sexes. It’s deceitful; it’s underhanded. It’s definitely a below-the-belt kind of weapon. But, as it was explained to me early in life, it was a most necessary ploy in a world where the male enemy held a significant power advantage in terms of authority and money. It was therefore perfectly acceptable.<BR/><BR/>It works like this: any time you are not getting your way by using facts and legitimate, reasoned argument, you must overwhelm your male opponent with unassailable emotional turmoil, i.e. a hissy-fit. In other words, take the argument to a level that your male adversary does not comprehend: pure emotion, unencumbered by rational thought. By purposely becoming irrational, and accusing your opponent of being “vicious,” “mean,” “unreasonable,” “vile,” “cruel,” “a bully,” et cetera, et cetera into lingual infinity, you effectively disarm your utterly reasonable opponent and ride the emotional wave of perfected guile to victory. In other words, you get your own way in the matter."<BR/><BR/>wv:pcaxjuAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-37201724373217866772007-11-01T11:16:00.000-07:002007-11-01T11:16:00.000-07:00When FL grows up and asks for the keys to the Gag-...When FL grows up and asks for the keys to the Gag-mobile, just remember what he managed to pull off with playskool wheels....Van Harveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08470413719262297062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8580258.post-46186786744510394732007-11-01T11:13:00.000-07:002007-11-01T11:13:00.000-07:00"It's no use to get into a... a thought fight with..."It's no use to get into a... a thought fight with a thinker, because you're both going to end up covered in thought, the only difference being that the thinker will enjoy it. Look, I didn't make up the rules here: Do not give dogs what is holy; and do not throw your pearls before swine." <BR/><BR/>But Uncle Jed, it's so much Fuuunnnn!<BR/>"Pffft!"<BR/><BR/>But...<BR/>"Pffft!" "Pffft!"<BR/><BR/>But, what I <I>would</I> do is so much harder than what I <I>do</I> do...<BR/>"Pffft!" "Pffft!" "Pffft!"<BR/><BR/>sigh.Van Harveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08470413719262297062noreply@blogger.com