Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Stop Contaminating Our Outside with Your Inside!

One thing that comes through in Inventing the Individual is the gradual historical differentiation of various spheres, powers, and concepts that had previously been merged. Most of these are things we take for granted, because they seem so fundamental to our experience, for example, the notion of a private self.

In a way, it is analogous to biological development, which is teleologically drawn toward differentiation and specialization. Think of how we all transition from zygote to blastocyst to fetus, as cells slowly differentiate into specific organ systems. Well, it is the same way with human development, both individually and collectively.

Most of the sciences were once fused with what we now know of as mythological approaches; for example, astronomy emerged from astrology, chemistry from alchemy, and meteorology from primitive superstitions about manmade climate change.

Let me see if I can compile a list of the differentiations brought about by Christianity: private from public self; inner from outer; individual from family; person from state; woman from man; child from father; law from custom; voluntary from compulsory; science from magic; and more.

One of the most critical of these is the gradual differentiation of inside from outside, which is most definitely ongoing. For example, mental illness almost always involves some conflation of inner and outer. Take a person with agoraphobia, i.e., fear of leaving the house. The fear is real, but what is she actually afraid of? The outside, or her own inside projected outward?

Sometimes entire political movements can be rooted in this atavism, for example, oh, THE WHOLE FREAKING DEMOCRATIC PARTY! The list is endless. For example, feminists tell us that there is a one in five chance of getting raped in college, whereas FBI statistics say that it is actually about a .06 chance. So feminist paranoiacs multiply the threat by a factor of (math is hard). But whatever the factor, it is not a factor of external reality, but of internal reality projected into fearsome men. Which I find fascinating.

Or, the left's complaints about the so-called 1%. This generous 1% pays 40% of the income tax. The 3% pays over half, and the 10% pays 71% to subsidize your lifestyle of being a professional complainer, since your half only accounts for 3% of federal revenues.

Likewise, are blacks really unfairly targeted by police? The short answer is of course no. Not only that, but both blacks and whites are in reality unfairly targeted by black criminals. The latter is the objective, verifiable truth, whereas the liberal belief is again a projection of the interior into the exterior. Which we wouldn't mind if they didn't proceed to act on the belief, as did the recent police assassin.

Do women really earn 77 cents on the manly dollar? No, of course not. That's just economics being infected by mind parasites. Do 97% of scientists believe in AGW? No, again, that's just some kind of projection of superego authority into omniscient science.

A critical point is that science only became possible with this withdrawal of psychic projections from the external world (I have posted on this subject a number of times, plus it's covered in the book). Siedentop only touches on this, but it's nice to have a little scholarly back-up for the common-sense revelations given to me by Petey.

Abelard reminds us that Christ said I am truth, not I am custom, or opinion, or political correctness. Which is why I believe that any truth is a function of the All-True, and why I have no concern that any new truth could possibly undermine the One Truth. Rather, it's all Good. Literally, because the Good and True converge in the Beautiful Three.

One of the problems of ancient thought is that it was too rooted in deduction from a priori principles (speaking of Schuon in yesterpost's comments, he sometimes makes this error). Conversely, it distrusted the empirical world as an ever-changing illusion, so it was very weak on induction. Thus, the development of science was hindered by Aristotelean assumptions such as the belief that the celestial sphere must operate on different laws than the terrestrial, or that things "seek" their home instead of being pulled there by gravity.

"The Christian preoccupation with 'innerness' and human agency -- an intensified awareness of the difference between 'inner' and 'outer' experience, between the will and the senses -- contributed to a veritable outburst of logical studies in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries" (Siedentop).

Note that this is prior to the scientific revolution that it rendered possible, for "It reflected a growing distrust of the coercive potential" of extra-mental "general terms or concepts." In other words, it was necessary to stop projecting these concepts into the world, and actually examine the world without preconceptions.

One of the preconceptions that had to be eliminated was teleology. But then science become re-conflated with a new conceptual abstraction that literally banished teleology, instead of simply excluding it for the sake of scientific method. As we will see, there are many Christian ideas that became detached from Christianity and then re-united with a more primitive reality.

One of the biggies is liberty. The very same liberty that was only made possible and intelligible via Christianity has been hijacked by the left and rendered absurd and destructive. With Christianity, individual and collective are irreducible complementarities, I would say due to the trinitarian structure of reality. But the left posits a radically detached individualistic interiority and fuses it with the exterior collective of the coercive state, in a wholly unholy alliance.

Too much time on comments to yesterday's post, so this one is over.

7 Comments:

Blogger julie said...

So feminist paranoiacs multiply the threat by a factor of (math is hard).

Ha - literal lol. I don't know the answer either, it would require me to switch brain gears.

12/23/2014 09:28:00 AM  
Blogger Van Harvey said...

"... Conversely, it distrusted the empirical world as an ever-changing illusion, so it was very weak on induction. Thus, the development of science was hindered by Aristotelean assumptions such as the belief that the celestial sphere must operate on different laws than the terrestrial, or that things "seek" their home instead of being pulled there by gravity."

Something that goes along with that, is the tendency, need... maybe even eagerness, to accept on Authority. Aristotle was making his best surmise on things, and in his logic made a point early on to point out that if your premises were wrong, then your Logic, no matter how dazzling, would be wrong. That injunction was almost immediately dropped by those who came after, seeking to use his ground level guestimates as unquestionable Authority.

And when you are following a system, the system absorbs you. But when you are seeking the Truth, and seeking it not only as something useful out there, but as vitally important to your inner self too, and ultimately integrating into the inwardly outwards as well, real evolution can occur.

12/23/2014 10:33:00 AM  
Blogger Magister said...

Pretty absorbing post, Bob, gives us a lot to think about.

Merry Christmas to all Raccoons!

12/23/2014 10:54:00 AM  
Blogger EbonyRaptor said...

Another biggie is salvation. As Obama said "... our individual salvation depends on our collective salvation." That turns Jesus' sacrifice for individual salvation into "works theology" which is heretical.

Humanist philosophies are so poorly thought out that it's a never ceasing source of amazement that otherwise intelligent people get trapped into the delusion.

12/23/2014 11:09:00 AM  
Blogger EbonyRaptor said...

Yes, as we celebrate the greatest gift ever giving, Merry Christmas everyone.

12/23/2014 11:13:00 AM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

IRT the feminists, they inflate their lies of epidemic rapes in the US by 33,333%.

Many feminazis inflate it much more than that. I reckon their "reasoning" hinges (unhingededly) on a massive inflation of their lies rather than the truth.
It's difficult to get converts to their cult if they tell the truth and say the chances of getting raped is .06%.

But this follows the leftist credo of massively inflating all their lies, such as "epidemic, racist police brutality, epidemic war on women, epidemic homelessness, epidemic hunger, etc." ad nauseam.

12/23/2014 12:14:00 PM  
Anonymous Skully said...

"Abelard reminds us that Christ said I am truth, not I am custom, or opinion, or political correctness. Which is why I believe that any truth is a function of the All-True, and why I have no concern that any new truth could possibly undermine the One Truth. Rather, it's all Good. Literally, because the Good and True converge in the Beautiful Three."

Aye! We can clearly see the rotten fruits of the fruits who are waging a war on reality.

12/23/2014 12:19:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home