Friday, December 16, 2011

Do All Planets Have Moonbats?

Well, that's disappointing. For the first time in like five years, I accidently deleted the whole post. If I can only relocate the tracks, I think I can reengineer the train of thought, more or less, but not in this slightly sour mood. Therefore, we'll continue with the next letter of Meditations on the Tarot, the Moon, and see what its made of. As always, your pre-enjoyed post has been outdated with new material and substandardly edited.

I suppose The Moon is always timely, since it also happens to be the Moonbat card.

That is, it is a meditation on the proper task of human intelligence, which is to liberate man from the type of magical enchantment that afflicts the secular world in general and the left in particular.

There are indeed "root causes" of such systematic blindness, applied stupidity, and moral idiocy, and they obviously have nothing to do with poverty, humiliation, or lack of education, since most of the bleeding blights of the left are conspicuously affluent, educated, and proud.

And these self-styled leaders, despite their tingle-inducing oratory, have always had difficulty selling their agenda to its so-called beneficiaries, which is why the agenda must always be forced upon the ungrateful bastards.

I'll be honest, if I may. Not only do we not know what is good for us, but I am beginning to seriously wonder if we are even worthy of Obama's generosity.

So, just how does one become an arrogant and sanctimonious buffoon of the left? One does it through considerable movement, but it is a retrograde movement, away from the nonlocal source and ground of vertical evolution.

As UF puts it, the Moon(bat) card "evokes ideas, feelings and impulses of will relating to the inversion of the evolutionary movement of life and consciousness, i.e., to their envelopment, arrest of movement, and retrograde movement."

Just as there are principles of growth, there are principles of existential shrinkage, the result being, by George, that the world isn't all it could be and should be -- and more!

In, say, Deepak's case, he obviously fancies himself to be some sort of fount of spiritual creativity (what other excuse could this windy Hindi have for gifting us with over sixty books?), but he is actually trapped and enveloped within a stagnant and predictable world view.

Admittedly, I've only seen samples, but I've never known him to express an original thought, only grammatically mangled banalities such as this week's steaming pile of sacred cow manure: "Everyone, I think, wants a better future, even when troubled times arise and a better future seems far away."

[The original post had a detailed example of Deepak's vileness, but I have excised it for the sake of speeding things along. I'm sure you get the idea.]

Such a mind does not radiate, but envelops; instead of a flowing current, it is a stagnant swamp. Hence, the perfect breeding ground for Monsters of the Id, or projected mind parasites. The problem is, leftist parasites always suck our blood, e.g., through taxes.

We couldn't care less if they sacrificed their own blood to their collectivist god. But why must we be forced to obey their state (as) religion? Isn't that unconstitutional or something?

Now, unKnown Friend points out that God has created -- or results in -- three sources of light: the sun, the moon, and the stars; or, creative light, reflected light, and revealed light; or again, intellect, matter (by which we mean the natural world), and revelation.

With regard to the moon, it is obviously inseparable from the earth around which it revolves (i.e., matter), so that lunar intelligence must be a kind of "reflection" of the material world. In itself, this is not problematic. But when isolated from the Sun of creative evolution and the Stars of revelation -- well, that is how you create the loony moonbat or the farking atheists who bark at the dark and call it light.

Because materiality has only to do with the more or less mechanical and repetitive aspects of the world, to be a moonbat is to exalt matter and convert oneself to a predictable machine that is its servant.

Now, such a thought machine knows nothing of starlight or sunlight, only the relative darkness of matter. And so the intellect is extinguished and "filled with dirt." It becomes as solid and impenetrable as rock, as our dirt-napping trolls mechanically and repetitively prove to us day in, day out.

Again, this is hardly to say that reflected moonlight is unnecessary or worthless. To the contrary, as UF points out, "if deprived of the environment of the material world," we would be "incapable of separating out particular things from their enduring totality and grouping them into categories and classes" (because of the divisibility and malleability of matter), but also "powerless to manufacture the implements and machines" which supplement our "organs of action and perception."

In other words, as we have discussed in a previous card, the radical transcendental realism of a Plato also results in a partial and therefore dysfunctional intelligence, because it regards the material world as totally in flux and therefore incapable of yielding any enduring truth.

Likewise -- or unwise -- the "illusionism" (if that's the proper word) of a Shankara, who regards the phenomenal world as pure maya, or illusion. One reason that there was no development in the Buddhist and Hindu worlds was because of this illusionism. Now that they have imported more realistic ideas from the west, they are taking off economically.

Now, if the Chinese could only find the Sun...

As we noted in that earlier post, both Christianity and Judaism specifically sanctify matter, so that we may develop the proper relationship to it, neither elevating it to a god (pantheism, materialism, atheism, Algoreism) or dismissing it as a kind of evil illusion (manicheism, gnosticism, and many strands of new-ageism, i.e., "The Secret").

Most moonbats are an incoherent combination of the two, in that they absurdly worship a world that is ultimately devoid of meaning. They are the inverse of the Islamists, who wish to destroy a resistant world that doesn't conform to their omnipotent infantile fantasies. Either way, the result is the same: if reality fails to conform to their ideological fantasy, then so much the worse for reality.

Life is ontologically anterior (but existentially posterior) to biology, just as consciousness is prior to matter. Matter is a kind of "congealed intelligence," which is why it is intelligible, precisely.

But it is not a "transparent" intelligibility, since it is always reflected intelligence, and if we identify our own intelligence only with it, we will be unable to leave its sphere and "leap" into the pure intellect -- just as life could never have inscaped matter if it only obeyed the laws of physics.

This latter intellect isn't quite so limited by reflected intelligence, so it sees into metaphysical principles more transparently. There went one just now!

Now, the Gospel of John urges us -- and I'm paraphrasing UF here -- to transpose intelligence from the domain of the created (i.e., the reflected intelligence of matter) to the domain of the creative Word. This is the difference between mere knowledge and true understanding, or between (k) and (n), respectively. The former is always "dead knowledge" (unless we give it life) that is bound to cause confusion and absurdity if we try to apply it to the living Knower.

But the latter is living knowledge, or wisdom, which is also integral knowledge of the whole. It is the knowledge that is "in the beginning," and is therefore always creative and always now. You will have noticed that the radical atheist has no coherent or even minimally credible explanation for the genesis of the knower -- and why anyone, himself included, would care what he thinks -- which is again why his knowledge is both dead and deadening.

Well, that post actually touched on some of the points I made in the Great Lost Post. Careful now: Save. Save again. Copy. No, copy, moron! Paste. Publish. There.

13 Comments:

Blogger mushroom said...

Not only do we not know what is good for us, but I am beginning to seriously wonder if we are even worthy of Obama's generosity.


I know that I am not, and it makes me really sad that I cannot measure up. I'm getting the Obama Willies just thinking about it. (Merry Christmas, JWM).

...since most of the bleeding blights of the left are conspicuously affluent, educated, and proud.

Yes, but somewhere along the way every one of them appears to have had his or her self-importance offended. It's the reason their humor is, in general, replete with snark and vulgarity and devoid of self-deprecation, and, hence, not all that funny.


...existential shrinkage, the result being, by George ...

No matter what happens today, I will think of this and smile.

12/16/2011 09:49:00 AM  
Blogger julie said...

You will have noticed that the radical atheist has no coherent or even minimally credible explanation for the genesis of the knower -- and why anyone, himself included, would care what he thinks -- which is again why his knowledge is both dead and deadening.

Apropos...

12/16/2011 12:34:00 PM  
Blogger julie said...

Now, unKnown Friend points out that God has created -- or results in -- three sources of light: the sun, the moon, and the stars; or, creative light, reflected light, and revealed light; or again, intellect, matter (by which we mean the natural world), and revelation.

Also apropos...

12/16/2011 12:38:00 PM  
Blogger Van said...

I haven't had a chance to read the post yet, but thought you'd all appreciate this
♬ ♪ ♫
... a Red Star on the Christmas Tree!... ♫ ♪ ♬

12/16/2011 06:52:00 PM  
Blogger Magnus Itland said...

Van,
so cute video! When I was young, back in the cold war era in Norway, one of our authors wrote a book with a similar name ("High in the top the red star", derived from a Nordic Christmas song) based on the premise of Soviet invading Norway on Christmas Eve. The inspiration for this was obviously the (then recent) Arab attack on Israel during Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year. Christmas Eve is the time of the year in Norway where everything stops up, so it would indeed have been a pretty good idea, from a tactical view. It never happened though, quite likely because everyone knew the Americans were crazy enough to risk wiping out all multicellular life on Earth rather than letting the Commies win.

12/17/2011 04:15:00 AM  
Blogger julie said...

Sadly, that will to win - for good to triumph over evil - no longer seems to be the case. Too many of the "good guys" have allowed themselves to be convinced they are evil, while the "bad guys" proclaim themselves as not only good, but good enough to know what's best for everyone else. Human condition, I suppose.

12/17/2011 07:22:00 AM  
Blogger ge said...

bob---immediate 'control+z' is a way to recover certain items just lost ---on a pc

kerouac hemingway bukowski, yourself, it happens to the best

12/17/2011 03:10:00 PM  
Blogger julie said...

Huh. Didn't see this one coming. Wonder what they'll do now?

12/18/2011 07:19:00 PM  
Blogger Gagdad Bob said...

We have a cold, so we are slacking off for the day. Even a slight disturbance in the force renders the Subject too distant and blurry. Nor do we want to merely toss out some precogitated bloggerilia, for that requires more thinking than one might imagine. Each fully half-baked post requires thorough detailing -- both inside and out -- not to mention a white-glove inspection for mind parasites and merciless removal of timebound or insufficiently ho-ho-holy ha-ha's. So carry on.

12/19/2011 06:31:00 AM  
Blogger Gagdad Bob said...

I do like how the AP describes Kim as "mercurial and enigmatic." Those are the first words that come to mind when I think of a genocidal tyrant.

12/19/2011 06:40:00 AM  
Blogger julie said...

Right? They make him sound like the kooky neighbor who's always doing weird experiments in his shed.

As far as the Norks go, I wonder how many of them feel as though they've just received the best Christmas present ever?

12/19/2011 08:26:00 AM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

"We couldn't care less if they sacrificed their own blood to their collectivist god. But why must we be forced to obey their state (as) religion? Isn't that unconstitutional or something?"

That it is. They want their religion (cult): the nanny State to be the official (and only) religion of the U.S..

Basically a suckular version of the Islamic State and yet, with so many similarities (fundamentalism, a ban on free speech (except for approved free speech), no representative government of all citizens, mob rule, victim mentality, etc..

12/19/2011 08:07:00 PM  
Blogger USS Ben USN (Ret) said...

Hope you feel better soon Bob.

You know, I bet if they quit wasting money on so much of the stupid AIDS research and instead spent it on curing the cold or pretty much anything else we would be seeing far better results than AIDS research has shown.

I mean, if you look at what we have got for the money that has been spent thus far it's readily apparent taxpayers are being bamboozled.

12/19/2011 08:15:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home